Beyond Competitive Gaming: How Casual Players Evaluate and Respond to Teammate Performance
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866915464448311296 |
|---|---|
| author | Nathan, Kaushall Senthil Lee, Jieun Wang, Derrick M. Smith, Geneva M. Kukshinov, Eugene Harley, Daniel Nacke, Lennart E. |
| author_facet | Nathan, Kaushall Senthil Lee, Jieun Wang, Derrick M. Smith, Geneva M. Kukshinov, Eugene Harley, Daniel Nacke, Lennart E. |
| contents | Teammate performance evaluation fundamentally shapes intervention design in video games. However, our current understanding stems primarily from competitive E-Sports contexts where individual performance directly impacts outcomes. This research addresses whether performance evaluation mechanisms and behavioural responses identified in competitive games generalize to casual cooperative games. We investigated how casual players evaluate teammate competence and respond behaviourally in a controlled between-subjects experiment (N=23). We manipulated confederate performance in Overcooked 2, combining observations, NASA TLX self-reports, and interviews. We present two key findings. (1) Observations revealed frustration behaviours completely absent in self-report data. Thus, these instruments assess fundamentally distinct constructs. (2) Participants consistently evaluated teammate performance through relative comparison rather than absolute metrics. This contradicts task-performance operationalizations dominant in competitive gaming research. Hence, performance evaluation frameworks from competitive contexts cannot be directly applied to casual cooperative games. We provide empirical evidence that performance evaluation in casual games requires a comparative operationalization. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_19230 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Beyond Competitive Gaming: How Casual Players Evaluate and Respond to Teammate Performance Nathan, Kaushall Senthil Lee, Jieun Wang, Derrick M. Smith, Geneva M. Kukshinov, Eugene Harley, Daniel Nacke, Lennart E. Human-Computer Interaction Teammate performance evaluation fundamentally shapes intervention design in video games. However, our current understanding stems primarily from competitive E-Sports contexts where individual performance directly impacts outcomes. This research addresses whether performance evaluation mechanisms and behavioural responses identified in competitive games generalize to casual cooperative games. We investigated how casual players evaluate teammate competence and respond behaviourally in a controlled between-subjects experiment (N=23). We manipulated confederate performance in Overcooked 2, combining observations, NASA TLX self-reports, and interviews. We present two key findings. (1) Observations revealed frustration behaviours completely absent in self-report data. Thus, these instruments assess fundamentally distinct constructs. (2) Participants consistently evaluated teammate performance through relative comparison rather than absolute metrics. This contradicts task-performance operationalizations dominant in competitive gaming research. Hence, performance evaluation frameworks from competitive contexts cannot be directly applied to casual cooperative games. We provide empirical evidence that performance evaluation in casual games requires a comparative operationalization. |
| title | Beyond Competitive Gaming: How Casual Players Evaluate and Respond to Teammate Performance |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19230 |