The Nature of Reasoning in Theology, Philosophy, and Mathematics
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911127316725760 |
|---|---|
| author | Mangum, Chad R. |
| author_facet | Mangum, Chad R. |
| contents | This article supports the epistemological claim that sound human reasoning about ultimate knowledge is either foundational or circularly justified. In particular, questions which naturally arise in theology, philosophy, and related disciplines, to the extent that they rationally treat ultimate knowledge, are necessarily supported in one of these ways. Comparisons with, contrasts to, and analogies from mathematics are given to illustrate and enhance this central claim. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_20297 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Nature of Reasoning in Theology, Philosophy, and Mathematics Mangum, Chad R. History and Overview This article supports the epistemological claim that sound human reasoning about ultimate knowledge is either foundational or circularly justified. In particular, questions which naturally arise in theology, philosophy, and related disciplines, to the extent that they rationally treat ultimate knowledge, are necessarily supported in one of these ways. Comparisons with, contrasts to, and analogies from mathematics are given to illustrate and enhance this central claim. |
| title | The Nature of Reasoning in Theology, Philosophy, and Mathematics |
| topic | History and Overview |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20297 |