Towards Enhancing Data Equity in Public Health Data Science
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866911127356571648 |
|---|---|
| author | Wang, Yiran Boyd, Alicia E. Rountree, Lillian Ren, Yi Nyhan, Kate Nagar, Ruchit Higginbottom, Jackson Ranney, Megan L. Parikh, Harsh Mukherjee, Bhramar |
| author_facet | Wang, Yiran Boyd, Alicia E. Rountree, Lillian Ren, Yi Nyhan, Kate Nagar, Ruchit Higginbottom, Jackson Ranney, Megan L. Parikh, Harsh Mukherjee, Bhramar |
| contents | Data-driven decisions shape public health policies and practice, yet persistent disparities in data representation skew insights and undermine interventions. To address this, we advance a structured roadmap that integrates public health data science with computer science and is grounded in reflexivity. We adopt data equity as a guiding concept: ensuring the fair and inclusive representation, collection, and use of data to prevent the introduction or exacerbation of systemic biases that could lead to invalid downstream inference and decisions. To underscore urgency, we present three public health cases where non-representative datasets and skewed knowledge impede decisions across diverse subgroups. These challenges echo themes in two literatures: public health highlights gaps in high-quality data for specific populations, while computer science and statistics contribute criteria and metrics for diagnosing bias in data and models. Building on these foundations, we propose a working definition of public health data equity and a structured self-audit framework. Our framework integrates core computational principles (fairness, accountability, transparency, ethics, privacy, confidentiality) with key public health considerations (selection bias, representativeness, generalizability, causality, information bias) to guide equitable practice across the data life cycle, from study design and data collection to measurement, analysis, interpretation, and translation. Embedding data equity in routine practice offers a practical path for ensuring that data-driven policies, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies improve health outcomes for all. Finally, we emphasize the critical understanding that, although data equity is an essential first step, it does not inherently guarantee information, learning, or decision equity. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_20301 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Towards Enhancing Data Equity in Public Health Data Science Wang, Yiran Boyd, Alicia E. Rountree, Lillian Ren, Yi Nyhan, Kate Nagar, Ruchit Higginbottom, Jackson Ranney, Megan L. Parikh, Harsh Mukherjee, Bhramar Applications Data-driven decisions shape public health policies and practice, yet persistent disparities in data representation skew insights and undermine interventions. To address this, we advance a structured roadmap that integrates public health data science with computer science and is grounded in reflexivity. We adopt data equity as a guiding concept: ensuring the fair and inclusive representation, collection, and use of data to prevent the introduction or exacerbation of systemic biases that could lead to invalid downstream inference and decisions. To underscore urgency, we present three public health cases where non-representative datasets and skewed knowledge impede decisions across diverse subgroups. These challenges echo themes in two literatures: public health highlights gaps in high-quality data for specific populations, while computer science and statistics contribute criteria and metrics for diagnosing bias in data and models. Building on these foundations, we propose a working definition of public health data equity and a structured self-audit framework. Our framework integrates core computational principles (fairness, accountability, transparency, ethics, privacy, confidentiality) with key public health considerations (selection bias, representativeness, generalizability, causality, information bias) to guide equitable practice across the data life cycle, from study design and data collection to measurement, analysis, interpretation, and translation. Embedding data equity in routine practice offers a practical path for ensuring that data-driven policies, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies improve health outcomes for all. Finally, we emphasize the critical understanding that, although data equity is an essential first step, it does not inherently guarantee information, learning, or decision equity. |
| title | Towards Enhancing Data Equity in Public Health Data Science |
| topic | Applications |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20301 |