JADES: A Universal Framework for Jailbreak Assessment via Decompositional Scoring

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Chu, Junjie, Li, Mingjie, Yang, Ziqing, Leng, Ye, Lin, Chenhao, Shen, Chao, Backes, Michael, Shen, Yun, Zhang, Yang
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866914011114635264
author Chu, Junjie
Li, Mingjie
Yang, Ziqing
Leng, Ye
Lin, Chenhao
Shen, Chao
Backes, Michael
Shen, Yun
Zhang, Yang
author_facet Chu, Junjie
Li, Mingjie
Yang, Ziqing
Leng, Ye
Lin, Chenhao
Shen, Chao
Backes, Michael
Shen, Yun
Zhang, Yang
contents Accurately determining whether a jailbreak attempt has succeeded is a fundamental yet unresolved challenge. Existing evaluation methods rely on misaligned proxy indicators or naive holistic judgments. They frequently misinterpret model responses, leading to inconsistent and subjective assessments that misalign with human perception. To address this gap, we introduce JADES (Jailbreak Assessment via Decompositional Scoring), a universal jailbreak evaluation framework. Its key mechanism is to automatically decompose an input harmful question into a set of weighted sub-questions, score each sub-answer, and weight-aggregate the sub-scores into a final decision. JADES also incorporates an optional fact-checking module to strengthen the detection of hallucinations in jailbreak responses. We validate JADES on JailbreakQR, a newly introduced benchmark proposed in this work, consisting of 400 pairs of jailbreak prompts and responses, each meticulously annotated by humans. In a binary setting (success/failure), JADES achieves 98.5% agreement with human evaluators, outperforming strong baselines by over 9%. Re-evaluating five popular attacks on four LLMs reveals substantial overestimation (e.g., LAA's attack success rate on GPT-3.5-Turbo drops from 93% to 69%). Our results show that JADES could deliver accurate, consistent, and interpretable evaluations, providing a reliable basis for measuring future jailbreak attacks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_20848
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle JADES: A Universal Framework for Jailbreak Assessment via Decompositional Scoring
Chu, Junjie
Li, Mingjie
Yang, Ziqing
Leng, Ye
Lin, Chenhao
Shen, Chao
Backes, Michael
Shen, Yun
Zhang, Yang
Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
Accurately determining whether a jailbreak attempt has succeeded is a fundamental yet unresolved challenge. Existing evaluation methods rely on misaligned proxy indicators or naive holistic judgments. They frequently misinterpret model responses, leading to inconsistent and subjective assessments that misalign with human perception. To address this gap, we introduce JADES (Jailbreak Assessment via Decompositional Scoring), a universal jailbreak evaluation framework. Its key mechanism is to automatically decompose an input harmful question into a set of weighted sub-questions, score each sub-answer, and weight-aggregate the sub-scores into a final decision. JADES also incorporates an optional fact-checking module to strengthen the detection of hallucinations in jailbreak responses. We validate JADES on JailbreakQR, a newly introduced benchmark proposed in this work, consisting of 400 pairs of jailbreak prompts and responses, each meticulously annotated by humans. In a binary setting (success/failure), JADES achieves 98.5% agreement with human evaluators, outperforming strong baselines by over 9%. Re-evaluating five popular attacks on four LLMs reveals substantial overestimation (e.g., LAA's attack success rate on GPT-3.5-Turbo drops from 93% to 69%). Our results show that JADES could deliver accurate, consistent, and interpretable evaluations, providing a reliable basis for measuring future jailbreak attacks.
title JADES: A Universal Framework for Jailbreak Assessment via Decompositional Scoring
topic Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20848