From Canonical to Complex: Benchmarking LLM Capabilities in Undergraduate Thermodynamics

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geißler, Anna, Bien, Luca-Sophie, Schöppler, Friedrich, Hertel, Tobias
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916925111533568
author Geißler, Anna
Bien, Luca-Sophie
Schöppler, Friedrich
Hertel, Tobias
author_facet Geißler, Anna
Bien, Luca-Sophie
Schöppler, Friedrich
Hertel, Tobias
contents Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered as tutoring aids in science education. Yet their readiness for unsupervised use in undergraduate instruction remains uncertain, as reliable teaching requires more than fluent recall: it demands consistent, principle-grounded reasoning. Thermodynamics, with its compact laws and subtle distinctions between state and path functions, reversibility, and entropy, provides an ideal testbed for evaluating such capabilities. Here we present UTQA, a 50-item undergraduate thermodynamics question answering benchmark, covering ideal-gas processes, reversibility, and diagram interpretation. No leading 2025-era model exceeded our 95\% competence threshold: the best LLMs achieved 82\% accuracy, with text-only items performing better than image reasoning tasks, which often fell to chance levels. Prompt phrasing and syntactic complexity showed modest to little correlation with performance. The gap concentrates in finite-rate/irreversible scenarios and in binding visual features to thermodynamic meaning, indicating that current LLMs are not yet suitable for unsupervised tutoring in this domain.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_21452
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle From Canonical to Complex: Benchmarking LLM Capabilities in Undergraduate Thermodynamics
Geißler, Anna
Bien, Luca-Sophie
Schöppler, Friedrich
Hertel, Tobias
Physics Education
Computation and Language
Chemical Physics
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered as tutoring aids in science education. Yet their readiness for unsupervised use in undergraduate instruction remains uncertain, as reliable teaching requires more than fluent recall: it demands consistent, principle-grounded reasoning. Thermodynamics, with its compact laws and subtle distinctions between state and path functions, reversibility, and entropy, provides an ideal testbed for evaluating such capabilities. Here we present UTQA, a 50-item undergraduate thermodynamics question answering benchmark, covering ideal-gas processes, reversibility, and diagram interpretation. No leading 2025-era model exceeded our 95\% competence threshold: the best LLMs achieved 82\% accuracy, with text-only items performing better than image reasoning tasks, which often fell to chance levels. Prompt phrasing and syntactic complexity showed modest to little correlation with performance. The gap concentrates in finite-rate/irreversible scenarios and in binding visual features to thermodynamic meaning, indicating that current LLMs are not yet suitable for unsupervised tutoring in this domain.
title From Canonical to Complex: Benchmarking LLM Capabilities in Undergraduate Thermodynamics
topic Physics Education
Computation and Language
Chemical Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21452