TempCore: Are Video QA Benchmarks Temporally Grounded? A Frame Selection Sensitivity Analysis and Benchmark

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Ok, Hyunjong, Lee, Jaeho
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866912970037002240
author Ok, Hyunjong
Lee, Jaeho
author_facet Ok, Hyunjong
Lee, Jaeho
contents Vision-language models (VLMs) can ingest only a limited number of video frames, making frame selection a practical necessity. But do current Video QA benchmarks genuinely require temporal frame selection, or can most questions be answered regardless of which frames are shown? We introduce Frame Selection Sensitivity (FSS), a per-sample diagnostic that measures how much VLM accuracy changes when the most relevant frames are replaced with the least relevant ones. Across six benchmarks and eight VLMs, we find that a large majority of samples are frame-agnostic: only a minority are genuinely sensitive to frame choice. Combining FSS with a Language Independence Score (LIS) reveals that merely 8--33% of samples are Temporally Sensitive. We construct TempCore, compact evaluation subsets that isolate these temporal samples from existing benchmarks, and will release code and per-sample annotations upon publication.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_01167
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle TempCore: Are Video QA Benchmarks Temporally Grounded? A Frame Selection Sensitivity Analysis and Benchmark
Ok, Hyunjong
Lee, Jaeho
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Vision-language models (VLMs) can ingest only a limited number of video frames, making frame selection a practical necessity. But do current Video QA benchmarks genuinely require temporal frame selection, or can most questions be answered regardless of which frames are shown? We introduce Frame Selection Sensitivity (FSS), a per-sample diagnostic that measures how much VLM accuracy changes when the most relevant frames are replaced with the least relevant ones. Across six benchmarks and eight VLMs, we find that a large majority of samples are frame-agnostic: only a minority are genuinely sensitive to frame choice. Combining FSS with a Language Independence Score (LIS) reveals that merely 8--33% of samples are Temporally Sensitive. We construct TempCore, compact evaluation subsets that isolate these temporal samples from existing benchmarks, and will release code and per-sample annotations upon publication.
title TempCore: Are Video QA Benchmarks Temporally Grounded? A Frame Selection Sensitivity Analysis and Benchmark
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01167