Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02221 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911134186995712 |
|---|---|
| author | Skoglund, Martin Warg, Fredrik Thorsén, Anders Punnekkat, Sasikumar Hansson, Hans |
| author_facet | Skoglund, Martin Warg, Fredrik Thorsén, Anders Punnekkat, Sasikumar Hansson, Hans |
| contents | The deployment of automated functions that can operate without direct human supervision has changed safety evaluation in domains seeking higher levels of automation. Unlike conventional systems that rely on human operators, these functions require new assessment frameworks to demonstrate that they do not introduce unacceptable risks under real-world conditions. To make a convincing safety claim, the developer must present a thorough justification argument, supported by evidence, that a function is free from unreasonable risk when operated in its intended context. The key concept relevant to the presented work is the intended context, often captured by an Operational Design Domain specification (ODD). ODD formalization is challenging due to the need to maintain flexibility in adopting diverse specification formats while preserving consistency and traceability and integrating seamlessly into the development, validation, and assessment. This paper presents a way to formalize an ODD in the Pkl language, addressing central challenges in specifying ODDs while improving usability through specialized configuration language features. The approach is illustrated with an automotive example but can be broadly applied to ensure rigorous assessments of operational contexts. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_02221 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Formalizing Operational Design Domains with the Pkl Language Skoglund, Martin Warg, Fredrik Thorsén, Anders Punnekkat, Sasikumar Hansson, Hans Software Engineering The deployment of automated functions that can operate without direct human supervision has changed safety evaluation in domains seeking higher levels of automation. Unlike conventional systems that rely on human operators, these functions require new assessment frameworks to demonstrate that they do not introduce unacceptable risks under real-world conditions. To make a convincing safety claim, the developer must present a thorough justification argument, supported by evidence, that a function is free from unreasonable risk when operated in its intended context. The key concept relevant to the presented work is the intended context, often captured by an Operational Design Domain specification (ODD). ODD formalization is challenging due to the need to maintain flexibility in adopting diverse specification formats while preserving consistency and traceability and integrating seamlessly into the development, validation, and assessment. This paper presents a way to formalize an ODD in the Pkl language, addressing central challenges in specifying ODDs while improving usability through specialized configuration language features. The approach is illustrated with an automotive example but can be broadly applied to ensure rigorous assessments of operational contexts. |
| title | Formalizing Operational Design Domains with the Pkl Language |
| topic | Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02221 |