Lessons Learned from Deploying Adaptive Machine Learning Agents with Limited Data for Real-time Cell Culture Process Monitoring

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Khuat, Thanh Tung, Peng, Johnny, Bassett, Robert, Otte, Ellen, Gabrys, Bogdan
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866908515772137472
author Khuat, Thanh Tung
Peng, Johnny
Bassett, Robert
Otte, Ellen
Gabrys, Bogdan
author_facet Khuat, Thanh Tung
Peng, Johnny
Bassett, Robert
Otte, Ellen
Gabrys, Bogdan
contents This study explores the deployment of three machine learning (ML) approaches for real-time prediction of glucose, lactate, and ammonium concentrations in cell culture processes, using Raman spectroscopy as input features. The research addresses challenges associated with limited data availability and process variability, providing a comparative analysis of pretrained models, just-in-time learning (JITL), and online learning algorithms. Two industrial case studies are presented to evaluate the impact of varying bioprocess conditions on model performance. The findings highlight the specific conditions under which pretrained models demonstrate superior predictive accuracy and identify scenarios where JITL or online learning approaches are more effective for adaptive process monitoring. This study also highlights the critical importance of updating the deployed models/agents with the latest offline analytical measurements during bioreactor operations to maintain the model performance against the changes in cell growth behaviours and operating conditions throughout the bioreactor run. Additionally, the study confirms the usefulness of a simple mixture-of-experts framework in achieving enhanced accuracy and robustness for real-time predictions of metabolite concentrations based on Raman spectral data. These insights contribute to the development of robust strategies for the efficient deployment of ML models in dynamic and changing biomanufacturing environments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_02606
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Lessons Learned from Deploying Adaptive Machine Learning Agents with Limited Data for Real-time Cell Culture Process Monitoring
Khuat, Thanh Tung
Peng, Johnny
Bassett, Robert
Otte, Ellen
Gabrys, Bogdan
Quantitative Methods
Machine Learning
A.1; J.3; I.2.0; I.2.6; I.2.m; I.5.4
This study explores the deployment of three machine learning (ML) approaches for real-time prediction of glucose, lactate, and ammonium concentrations in cell culture processes, using Raman spectroscopy as input features. The research addresses challenges associated with limited data availability and process variability, providing a comparative analysis of pretrained models, just-in-time learning (JITL), and online learning algorithms. Two industrial case studies are presented to evaluate the impact of varying bioprocess conditions on model performance. The findings highlight the specific conditions under which pretrained models demonstrate superior predictive accuracy and identify scenarios where JITL or online learning approaches are more effective for adaptive process monitoring. This study also highlights the critical importance of updating the deployed models/agents with the latest offline analytical measurements during bioreactor operations to maintain the model performance against the changes in cell growth behaviours and operating conditions throughout the bioreactor run. Additionally, the study confirms the usefulness of a simple mixture-of-experts framework in achieving enhanced accuracy and robustness for real-time predictions of metabolite concentrations based on Raman spectral data. These insights contribute to the development of robust strategies for the efficient deployment of ML models in dynamic and changing biomanufacturing environments.
title Lessons Learned from Deploying Adaptive Machine Learning Agents with Limited Data for Real-time Cell Culture Process Monitoring
topic Quantitative Methods
Machine Learning
A.1; J.3; I.2.0; I.2.6; I.2.m; I.5.4
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02606