Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02738 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908756463321088 |
|---|---|
| author | Guarracino, Federico Mascolo, Ida |
| author_facet | Guarracino, Federico Mascolo, Ida |
| contents | One of the oldest and most common structural engineering issues is the elastic buckling of circular rings under external pressure, which has a fundamental importance in a number of applications in general mechanics, engineering and bio-physics, just to name a few. Levy is considered to have provided the first significant solution to this problem in 1884, and most stability text-books make reference to this original solution, which is based on the Euler-Bernoulli beam model. Following this incipit, over the past one hundred and forty years a huge number of papers have continued to analyse many special cases and extensions. However, the majority of these studies tend to build on the a-priori assumption of inextensibility of the ring centre line without investigating the real significance and extent of this condition. Here, in the framework of a suitable non-linear kinematic, the problem is re-examined from its roots, and it is shown that not only the inextensibility paradigm cannot straightforwardly lead to the classic solution in an energy framework, but, on the contrary, the extensibility of the ring is necessary to allow a unified and meaningful treatment of buckling and initial post-buckling behaviour for a complete variety of cases. On these bases, some facts and results in literature are rectified and discussed. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_02738 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On the inextensibility assumption in the stability of elastic rings: overhaul of a traditional paradigm Guarracino, Federico Mascolo, Ida Mathematical Physics 74K10 One of the oldest and most common structural engineering issues is the elastic buckling of circular rings under external pressure, which has a fundamental importance in a number of applications in general mechanics, engineering and bio-physics, just to name a few. Levy is considered to have provided the first significant solution to this problem in 1884, and most stability text-books make reference to this original solution, which is based on the Euler-Bernoulli beam model. Following this incipit, over the past one hundred and forty years a huge number of papers have continued to analyse many special cases and extensions. However, the majority of these studies tend to build on the a-priori assumption of inextensibility of the ring centre line without investigating the real significance and extent of this condition. Here, in the framework of a suitable non-linear kinematic, the problem is re-examined from its roots, and it is shown that not only the inextensibility paradigm cannot straightforwardly lead to the classic solution in an energy framework, but, on the contrary, the extensibility of the ring is necessary to allow a unified and meaningful treatment of buckling and initial post-buckling behaviour for a complete variety of cases. On these bases, some facts and results in literature are rectified and discussed. |
| title | On the inextensibility assumption in the stability of elastic rings: overhaul of a traditional paradigm |
| topic | Mathematical Physics 74K10 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02738 |