Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03176 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918135005708288 |
|---|---|
| author | Aksoy, Serra |
| author_facet | Aksoy, Serra |
| contents | Attribution methods explain neural network predictions by identifying influential input features, but their evaluation suffers from threshold selection bias that can reverse method rankings and undermine conclusions. Current protocols binarize attribution maps at single thresholds, where threshold choice alone can alter rankings by over 200 percentage points. We address this flaw with a threshold-free framework that computes Area Under the Curve for Intersection over Union (AUC-IoU), capturing attribution quality across the full threshold spectrum. Evaluating seven attribution methods on dermatological imaging, we show single-threshold metrics yield contradictory results, while threshold-free evaluation provides reliable differentiation. XRAI achieves 31% improvement over LIME and 204% over vanilla Integrated Gradients, with size-stratified analysis revealing performance variations up to 269% across lesion scales. These findings establish methodological standards that eliminate evaluation artifacts and enable evidence-based method selection. The threshold-free framework provides both theoretical insight into attribution behavior and practical guidance for robust comparison in medical imaging and beyond. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_03176 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Systematic Evaluation of Attribution Methods: Eliminating Threshold Bias and Revealing Method-Dependent Performance Patterns Aksoy, Serra Machine Learning Attribution methods explain neural network predictions by identifying influential input features, but their evaluation suffers from threshold selection bias that can reverse method rankings and undermine conclusions. Current protocols binarize attribution maps at single thresholds, where threshold choice alone can alter rankings by over 200 percentage points. We address this flaw with a threshold-free framework that computes Area Under the Curve for Intersection over Union (AUC-IoU), capturing attribution quality across the full threshold spectrum. Evaluating seven attribution methods on dermatological imaging, we show single-threshold metrics yield contradictory results, while threshold-free evaluation provides reliable differentiation. XRAI achieves 31% improvement over LIME and 204% over vanilla Integrated Gradients, with size-stratified analysis revealing performance variations up to 269% across lesion scales. These findings establish methodological standards that eliminate evaluation artifacts and enable evidence-based method selection. The threshold-free framework provides both theoretical insight into attribution behavior and practical guidance for robust comparison in medical imaging and beyond. |
| title | Systematic Evaluation of Attribution Methods: Eliminating Threshold Bias and Revealing Method-Dependent Performance Patterns |
| topic | Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03176 |