Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06259 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866912576027230208 |
|---|---|
| author | Razak, Mohammed Abdel |
| author_facet | Razak, Mohammed Abdel |
| contents | This paper presents the first structured evaluation of Solar System bodies hypothetically relocated to Earth orbit (1 AU) to assess their potential as alternative habitats. Using comparative criteria, planetary size and gravity, atmospheric retention, volatile accessibility, weather system potential, soil development feasibility, and orbital transfer cost. We find that most bodies are unsuitable. Mercury and the Moon lack volatiles and atmospheres, while gas and ice giants offer no solid surfaces. Venus, despite strong atmospheric retention, remains constrained by extreme greenhouse forcing. Mars emerges as the most viable candidate, balancing accessibility and volatile resources. Titan provides a conditional long-term promise, with a dense atmosphere and rich organics that could transition to a water-based cycle at 1 AU. These findings highlight new pathways for planetary engineering and long-term human survival. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_06259 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Toward Alternative Earths' Habitability of Solar System Bodies at Earth's Orbit Razak, Mohammed Abdel Earth and Planetary Astrophysics This paper presents the first structured evaluation of Solar System bodies hypothetically relocated to Earth orbit (1 AU) to assess their potential as alternative habitats. Using comparative criteria, planetary size and gravity, atmospheric retention, volatile accessibility, weather system potential, soil development feasibility, and orbital transfer cost. We find that most bodies are unsuitable. Mercury and the Moon lack volatiles and atmospheres, while gas and ice giants offer no solid surfaces. Venus, despite strong atmospheric retention, remains constrained by extreme greenhouse forcing. Mars emerges as the most viable candidate, balancing accessibility and volatile resources. Titan provides a conditional long-term promise, with a dense atmosphere and rich organics that could transition to a water-based cycle at 1 AU. These findings highlight new pathways for planetary engineering and long-term human survival. |
| title | Toward Alternative Earths' Habitability of Solar System Bodies at Earth's Orbit |
| topic | Earth and Planetary Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06259 |