Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Braun, Daniel
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08480
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914031345860608
author Braun, Daniel
author_facet Braun, Daniel
contents Acquiescence bias, i.e. the tendency of humans to agree with statements in surveys, independent of their actual beliefs, is well researched and documented. Since Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be very influenceable by relatively small changes in input and are trained on human-generated data, it is reasonable to assume that they could show a similar tendency. We present a study investigating the presence of acquiescence bias in LLMs across different models, tasks, and languages (English, German, and Polish). Our results indicate that, contrary to humans, LLMs display a bias towards answering no, regardless of whether it indicates agreement or disagreement.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_08480
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Acquiescence Bias in Large Language Models
Braun, Daniel
Computation and Language
Acquiescence bias, i.e. the tendency of humans to agree with statements in surveys, independent of their actual beliefs, is well researched and documented. Since Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be very influenceable by relatively small changes in input and are trained on human-generated data, it is reasonable to assume that they could show a similar tendency. We present a study investigating the presence of acquiescence bias in LLMs across different models, tasks, and languages (English, German, and Polish). Our results indicate that, contrary to humans, LLMs display a bias towards answering no, regardless of whether it indicates agreement or disagreement.
title Acquiescence Bias in Large Language Models
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08480