Cover Image

How well can LLMs provide planning feedback in grounded environments?

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Li, Yuxuan, Zhong, Victor
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

How well can LLMs Grade Essays in Arabic?
by: Ghazawi, Rayed, et al.
Published: (2025)

How well do LLMs reason over tabular data, really?
by: Wolff, Cornelius, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLMs can Schedule
by: Abgaryan, Henrik, et al.
Published: (2024)

How well can a large language model explain business processes as perceived by users?
by: Fahland, Dirk, et al.
Published: (2024)

Automatic parking planning control method based on improved A* algorithm
by: Zhao, Yuxuan
Published: (2024)

Delayed homomorphic reinforcement learning for environments with delayed feedback
by: Lee, Jongsoo, et al.
Published: (2026)

An intelligent tutor for planning in large partially observable environments
by: Heindrich, Lovis, et al.
Published: (2023)

lmgame-Bench: How Good are LLMs at Playing Games?
by: Hu, Lanxiang, et al.
Published: (2025)

How well do LLMs cite relevant medical references? An evaluation framework and analyses
by: Wu, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs can Realize Combinatorial Creativity: Generating Creative Ideas via LLMs for Scientific Research
by: Gu, Tianyang, et al.
Published: (2024)

Decoding Emotion in the Deep: A Systematic Study of How LLMs Represent, Retain, and Express Emotion
by: Zhang, Jingxiang, et al.
Published: (2025)

The application of GPT-4 in grading design university students' assignment and providing feedback: An exploratory study
by: Huang, Qian, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can LLMs plan paths in the real world?
by: Chen, Wanyi, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs can Find Mathematical Reasoning Mistakes by Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought
by: Jiang, Zhuoxuan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures
by: Zhu, Kunlun, et al.
Published: (2025)

Synthelite: Chemist-aligned and feasibility-aware synthesis planning with LLMs
by: Xuan-Vu, Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2025)

Position: How can Graphs Help Large Language Models?
by: Wang, Xiyuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

LLMs can be easily Confused by Instructional Distractions
by: Hwang, Yerin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Guideline-grounded retrieval-augmented generation for ophthalmic clinical decision support
by: Chen, Shuying, et al.
Published: (2026)

Choosing with unknown causal information: Action-outcome probabilities for decision making can be grounded in causal models
by: Soto, Mauricio Gonzalez, et al.
Published: (2019)

Do LLMs estimate uncertainty well in instruction-following?
by: Heo, Juyeon, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs cannot find reasoning errors, but can correct them given the error location
by: Tyen, Gladys, et al.
Published: (2023)

FineTuneBench: How well do commercial fine-tuning APIs infuse knowledge into LLMs?
by: Wu, Eric, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs can construct powerful representations and streamline sample-efficient supervised learning
by: Demirel, Ilker, et al.
Published: (2026)

How vehicles change lanes after encountering crashes: Empirical analysis and modeling
by: Chen, Kequan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Fitting Is Not Enough: Smoothness in Extremely Quantized LLMs
by: Xu, Yuzhuang, et al.
Published: (2026)

Monte Carlo Tree Search with Velocity Obstacles for safe and efficient motion planning in dynamic environments
by: Bonanni, Lorenzo, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLMs Gaming Verifiers: RLVR can Lead to Reward Hacking
by: Helff, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2026)

How attention simplifies mental representations for planning
by: Castanheira, Jason da Silva, et al.
Published: (2025)

Interactive AI NPCs Powered by LLMs: Technical Report for the CPDC Challenge 2025
by: Huang, Yitian, et al.
Published: (2025)

AgGym: An agricultural biotic stress simulation environment for ultra-precision management planning
by: Khosravi, Mahsa, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs can Compress LLMs: Adaptive Pruning by Agents
by: Kodathala, Sai Varun, et al.
Published: (2026)

Autonomous search of real-life environments combining dynamical system-based path planning and unsupervised learning
by: Amadasun, Uyiosa Philip, et al.
Published: (2023)

No Need for Explanations: LLMs can implicitly learn from mistakes in-context
by: Alazraki, Lisa, et al.
Published: (2025)

What's the plan? Metrics for implicit planning in LLMs and their application to rhyme generation and question answering
by: Maar, Jim, et al.
Published: (2026)

How can we assess human-agent interactions? Case studies in software agent design
by: Chen, Valerie, et al.
Published: (2025)

Systematic Failures in Collective Reasoning under Distributed Information in Multi-Agent LLMs
by: Li, Yuxuan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Grounding LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Embodied Actions
by: Zhang, Bo, et al.
Published: (2026)

What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?
by: Chen, Shiping, et al.
Published: (2026)

Can LLMs Score Medical Diagnoses and Clinical Reasoning as well as Expert Panels?
by: Rouillard, Amy, et al.
Published: (2026)