Teaching large language models to reason like expert diagnosticians

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckley, Thomas A., Conci, Riccardo, Brodeur, Peter G., Gusdorf, Jason, Beltrán, Sourik, Behrouzi, Bita, Crowe, Byron, Dockterman, Jacob, Muhammad, Muzzammil, Ohnigian, Sarah, Sanchez, Andrew, Diao, James A., Shah, Aashna P., Restrepo, Daniel, Rosenberg, Eric S., Lea, Andrew S., Glanton, Emily, LeBlanc, Kimberly, Network, Undiagnosed Diseases, Zitnik, Marinka, Podolsky, Scott H., Kanjee, Zahir, Abdulnour, Raja-Elie E., Koshy, Jacob M., Rodman, Adam, Manrai, Arjun K.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914598459801600
author Buckley, Thomas A.
Conci, Riccardo
Brodeur, Peter G.
Gusdorf, Jason
Beltrán, Sourik
Behrouzi, Bita
Crowe, Byron
Dockterman, Jacob
Muhammad, Muzzammil
Ohnigian, Sarah
Sanchez, Andrew
Diao, James A.
Shah, Aashna P.
Restrepo, Daniel
Rosenberg, Eric S.
Lea, Andrew S.
Glanton, Emily
LeBlanc, Kimberly
Network, Undiagnosed Diseases
Zitnik, Marinka
Podolsky, Scott H.
Kanjee, Zahir
Abdulnour, Raja-Elie E.
Koshy, Jacob M.
Rodman, Adam
Manrai, Arjun K.
author_facet Buckley, Thomas A.
Conci, Riccardo
Brodeur, Peter G.
Gusdorf, Jason
Beltrán, Sourik
Behrouzi, Bita
Crowe, Byron
Dockterman, Jacob
Muhammad, Muzzammil
Ohnigian, Sarah
Sanchez, Andrew
Diao, James A.
Shah, Aashna P.
Restrepo, Daniel
Rosenberg, Eric S.
Lea, Andrew S.
Glanton, Emily
LeBlanc, Kimberly
Network, Undiagnosed Diseases
Zitnik, Marinka
Podolsky, Scott H.
Kanjee, Zahir
Abdulnour, Raja-Elie E.
Koshy, Jacob M.
Rodman, Adam
Manrai, Arjun K.
contents Differential diagnosis is an iterative process that integrates patient information with broader medical knowledge. Clinical case series such as the NEJM Clinicopathologic Conferences (CPCs), published continuously since 1923, feature expert physicians who demonstrate diagnostic reasoning to peers, and have been used for decades to evaluate AI. However, prior AI evaluations have largely focused on final diagnostic accuracy rather than nuanced clinical reasoning. Here, we introduce Dr. CaBot, an agentic AI system that emulates an expert diagnostician by generating written and narrated slide-based presentations from an initial case description alone. CaBot recently generated the first AI diagnosis published in the 100+ year history of the NEJM CPCs. In blinded evaluations, physicians misclassified the source of the differential (CaBot vs. physician-written) in 46/62 (74%) of trials and rated them favorably across quality dimensions. When tasked with solving cases for 72 patients with undiagnosed disease from the NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Network, CaBot identified the working diagnosis in 50/72 (69%) of cases from referral notes alone. To promote transparency and research, we also developed CPC-Bench, a physician-validated benchmark based on 7,102 CPCs and 47,648 questions across 10 tasks. We show that CaBot outperforms frontier models on CPC-Bench, and release both CaBot and CPC-Bench publicly to foster progress in clinical AI.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_12194
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Teaching large language models to reason like expert diagnosticians
Buckley, Thomas A.
Conci, Riccardo
Brodeur, Peter G.
Gusdorf, Jason
Beltrán, Sourik
Behrouzi, Bita
Crowe, Byron
Dockterman, Jacob
Muhammad, Muzzammil
Ohnigian, Sarah
Sanchez, Andrew
Diao, James A.
Shah, Aashna P.
Restrepo, Daniel
Rosenberg, Eric S.
Lea, Andrew S.
Glanton, Emily
LeBlanc, Kimberly
Network, Undiagnosed Diseases
Zitnik, Marinka
Podolsky, Scott H.
Kanjee, Zahir
Abdulnour, Raja-Elie E.
Koshy, Jacob M.
Rodman, Adam
Manrai, Arjun K.
Artificial Intelligence
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Differential diagnosis is an iterative process that integrates patient information with broader medical knowledge. Clinical case series such as the NEJM Clinicopathologic Conferences (CPCs), published continuously since 1923, feature expert physicians who demonstrate diagnostic reasoning to peers, and have been used for decades to evaluate AI. However, prior AI evaluations have largely focused on final diagnostic accuracy rather than nuanced clinical reasoning. Here, we introduce Dr. CaBot, an agentic AI system that emulates an expert diagnostician by generating written and narrated slide-based presentations from an initial case description alone. CaBot recently generated the first AI diagnosis published in the 100+ year history of the NEJM CPCs. In blinded evaluations, physicians misclassified the source of the differential (CaBot vs. physician-written) in 46/62 (74%) of trials and rated them favorably across quality dimensions. When tasked with solving cases for 72 patients with undiagnosed disease from the NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Network, CaBot identified the working diagnosis in 50/72 (69%) of cases from referral notes alone. To promote transparency and research, we also developed CPC-Bench, a physician-validated benchmark based on 7,102 CPCs and 47,648 questions across 10 tasks. We show that CaBot outperforms frontier models on CPC-Bench, and release both CaBot and CPC-Bench publicly to foster progress in clinical AI.
title Teaching large language models to reason like expert diagnosticians
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12194