MedFact: Benchmarking the Fact-Checking Capabilities of Large Language Models on Chinese Medical Texts

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He, Jiayi, Huang, Yangmin, Du, Qianyun, Zhou, Xiangying, He, Zhiyang, Hu, Jiaxue, Tao, Xiaodong, Lai, Lixian
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916065737441280
author He, Jiayi
Huang, Yangmin
Du, Qianyun
Zhou, Xiangying
He, Zhiyang
Hu, Jiaxue
Tao, Xiaodong
Lai, Lixian
author_facet He, Jiayi
Huang, Yangmin
Du, Qianyun
Zhou, Xiangying
He, Zhiyang
Hu, Jiaxue
Tao, Xiaodong
Lai, Lixian
contents Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in medical applications requires fact-checking capabilities to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance. We introduce MedFact, a challenging Chinese medical fact-checking benchmark with 2,116 expert-annotated instances from diverse real-world texts, spanning 13 specialties, 8 error types, 4 writing styles, and 5 difficulty levels. Construction uses a hybrid AI-human framework where iterative expert feedback refines AI-driven, multi-criteria filtering to ensure high quality and difficulty. We evaluate 20 leading LLMs on veracity classification and error localization, and results show models often determine if text contains errors but struggle to localize them precisely, with top performers falling short of human performance. Our analysis reveals the "over-criticism" phenomenon, a tendency for models to misidentify correct information as erroneous, which can be exacerbated by advanced reasoning techniques such as multi-agent collaboration and inference-time scaling. MedFact highlights the challenges of deploying medical LLMs and provides resources to develop factually reliable medical AI systems.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_12440
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle MedFact: Benchmarking the Fact-Checking Capabilities of Large Language Models on Chinese Medical Texts
He, Jiayi
Huang, Yangmin
Du, Qianyun
Zhou, Xiangying
He, Zhiyang
Hu, Jiaxue
Tao, Xiaodong
Lai, Lixian
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in medical applications requires fact-checking capabilities to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance. We introduce MedFact, a challenging Chinese medical fact-checking benchmark with 2,116 expert-annotated instances from diverse real-world texts, spanning 13 specialties, 8 error types, 4 writing styles, and 5 difficulty levels. Construction uses a hybrid AI-human framework where iterative expert feedback refines AI-driven, multi-criteria filtering to ensure high quality and difficulty. We evaluate 20 leading LLMs on veracity classification and error localization, and results show models often determine if text contains errors but struggle to localize them precisely, with top performers falling short of human performance. Our analysis reveals the "over-criticism" phenomenon, a tendency for models to misidentify correct information as erroneous, which can be exacerbated by advanced reasoning techniques such as multi-agent collaboration and inference-time scaling. MedFact highlights the challenges of deploying medical LLMs and provides resources to develop factually reliable medical AI systems.
title MedFact: Benchmarking the Fact-Checking Capabilities of Large Language Models on Chinese Medical Texts
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12440