Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13682 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909791968821248 |
|---|---|
| author | Gärtner, Niklas |
| author_facet | Gärtner, Niklas |
| contents | Evidence-Based Climate Policy (EBCP) is an approach to policymaking that relies on evidence to make decisions about managing climate impacts, mitigation, and adaptation. A core problem for EBCP is the lack of a clear definition of evidence, a fundamental concept to the theory. The literature often draws on evidence-based medicine (EBM), where evidence is typically empirical data from scientific research or systematic investigations and quality is arranged within an evidence hierarchy with randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis on top. However, this conception and hierarchy is insufficient for EBCP, which requires context-appropriate evidence, such as expert judgments, model-based probabilities, and scenario analysis. In EBCP what counts as evidence must be reassessed for relevance, quality and availability in the specific context. To demonstrate different types of evidence used in EBCP, this research is based on a case study on PNACC-3. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_13682 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Climate Policy Gärtner, Niklas Physics and Society Evidence-Based Climate Policy (EBCP) is an approach to policymaking that relies on evidence to make decisions about managing climate impacts, mitigation, and adaptation. A core problem for EBCP is the lack of a clear definition of evidence, a fundamental concept to the theory. The literature often draws on evidence-based medicine (EBM), where evidence is typically empirical data from scientific research or systematic investigations and quality is arranged within an evidence hierarchy with randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis on top. However, this conception and hierarchy is insufficient for EBCP, which requires context-appropriate evidence, such as expert judgments, model-based probabilities, and scenario analysis. In EBCP what counts as evidence must be reassessed for relevance, quality and availability in the specific context. To demonstrate different types of evidence used in EBCP, this research is based on a case study on PNACC-3. |
| title | Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Climate Policy |
| topic | Physics and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13682 |