Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14197 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909793335115776 |
|---|---|
| author | Ghafouri, Vahid McNeil, Robert Yankov, Teodor Sumption, Madeleine Rocher, Luc Hale, Scott A. Mahdi, Adam |
| author_facet | Ghafouri, Vahid McNeil, Robert Yankov, Teodor Sumption, Madeleine Rocher, Luc Hale, Scott A. Mahdi, Adam |
| contents | We present a large-scale computational analysis of migration-related discourse in UK parliamentary debates spanning over 75 years and compare it with US congressional discourse. Using open-weight LLMs, we annotate each statement with high-level stances toward migrants and track the net tone toward migrants across time and political parties. For the UK, we extend this with a semi-automated framework for extracting fine-grained narrative frames to capture nuances of migration discourse. Our findings show that, while US discourse has grown increasingly polarised, UK parliamentary attitudes remain relatively aligned across parties, with a persistent ideological gap between Labour and the Conservatives, reaching its most negative level in 2025. The analysis of narrative frames in the UK parliamentary statements reveals a shift toward securitised narratives such as border control and illegal immigration, while longer-term integration-oriented frames such as social integration have declined. Moreover, discussions of national law about immigration have been replaced over time by international law and human rights, revealing nuances in discourse trends. Taken together broadly, our findings demonstrate how LLMs can support scalable, fine-grained discourse analysis in political and historical contexts. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_14197 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Framing Migration: A Computational Analysis of UK Parliamentary Discourse Ghafouri, Vahid McNeil, Robert Yankov, Teodor Sumption, Madeleine Rocher, Luc Hale, Scott A. Mahdi, Adam Computation and Language Computers and Society We present a large-scale computational analysis of migration-related discourse in UK parliamentary debates spanning over 75 years and compare it with US congressional discourse. Using open-weight LLMs, we annotate each statement with high-level stances toward migrants and track the net tone toward migrants across time and political parties. For the UK, we extend this with a semi-automated framework for extracting fine-grained narrative frames to capture nuances of migration discourse. Our findings show that, while US discourse has grown increasingly polarised, UK parliamentary attitudes remain relatively aligned across parties, with a persistent ideological gap between Labour and the Conservatives, reaching its most negative level in 2025. The analysis of narrative frames in the UK parliamentary statements reveals a shift toward securitised narratives such as border control and illegal immigration, while longer-term integration-oriented frames such as social integration have declined. Moreover, discussions of national law about immigration have been replaced over time by international law and human rights, revealing nuances in discourse trends. Taken together broadly, our findings demonstrate how LLMs can support scalable, fine-grained discourse analysis in political and historical contexts. |
| title | Framing Migration: A Computational Analysis of UK Parliamentary Discourse |
| topic | Computation and Language Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14197 |