Functorial equivalence classes of $2$-blocks of tame representation type

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Boltje, Robert, Bouc, Serge, Yılmaz, Deniz
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866908545432158208
author Boltje, Robert
Bouc, Serge
Yılmaz, Deniz
author_facet Boltje, Robert
Bouc, Serge
Yılmaz, Deniz
contents For any block of a finite group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $2$ which has dihedral, semidihedral, or generalized quaternion defect groups, we determine explicitly the decomposition of the associated diagonal $p$-permutation functor over an algebraically closed field $\mathbb{F}$ of characteristic $0$ into a direct sum of simple functors. As a consequence we see that two blocks with dihedral, semidihedral, or generalized quaternion defect groups are functorially equivalent over $\mathbb{F}$ if and only if their fusion systems are isomorphic. It is an open question if two blocks (with arbitrary defect groups) that are functorially equivalent over $\mathbb{F}$ must have isomorphic fusion systems. The converse is wrong in general.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_14682
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Functorial equivalence classes of $2$-blocks of tame representation type
Boltje, Robert
Bouc, Serge
Yılmaz, Deniz
Representation Theory
20C20 (Primary), 20J15, 19A22 (Secondary)
For any block of a finite group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $2$ which has dihedral, semidihedral, or generalized quaternion defect groups, we determine explicitly the decomposition of the associated diagonal $p$-permutation functor over an algebraically closed field $\mathbb{F}$ of characteristic $0$ into a direct sum of simple functors. As a consequence we see that two blocks with dihedral, semidihedral, or generalized quaternion defect groups are functorially equivalent over $\mathbb{F}$ if and only if their fusion systems are isomorphic. It is an open question if two blocks (with arbitrary defect groups) that are functorially equivalent over $\mathbb{F}$ must have isomorphic fusion systems. The converse is wrong in general.
title Functorial equivalence classes of $2$-blocks of tame representation type
topic Representation Theory
20C20 (Primary), 20J15, 19A22 (Secondary)
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14682