Projective geodesic extensions by conformal modifications in nonholonomic mechanics

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Belrhazi, Malika, Mestdag, Tom
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866914382003306496
author Belrhazi, Malika
Mestdag, Tom
author_facet Belrhazi, Malika
Mestdag, Tom
contents Projective geodesic extensions are reparametrizations of the trajectories of a nonholonomic mechanical system (with only a kinetic energy Lagrangian), in such a way that they can be interpreted as part of the geodesics of a Riemannian metric. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of these extensions, in the case where the constrained Lagrangian remains preserved up to a conformal transformation. When the nonholonomic system has a symmetry group (a Chaplygin system), we clarify the relation between projective geodesic extensions and closely related concepts, such as $ϕ$-simplicity, invariant measures and Hamiltonization. Throughout the paper, new and relevant examples illustrate the key differences between all these concepts.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_15863
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Projective geodesic extensions by conformal modifications in nonholonomic mechanics
Belrhazi, Malika
Mestdag, Tom
Differential Geometry
37J06, 37J60, 53Z05, 70G45, 70G65
Projective geodesic extensions are reparametrizations of the trajectories of a nonholonomic mechanical system (with only a kinetic energy Lagrangian), in such a way that they can be interpreted as part of the geodesics of a Riemannian metric. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of these extensions, in the case where the constrained Lagrangian remains preserved up to a conformal transformation. When the nonholonomic system has a symmetry group (a Chaplygin system), we clarify the relation between projective geodesic extensions and closely related concepts, such as $ϕ$-simplicity, invariant measures and Hamiltonization. Throughout the paper, new and relevant examples illustrate the key differences between all these concepts.
title Projective geodesic extensions by conformal modifications in nonholonomic mechanics
topic Differential Geometry
37J06, 37J60, 53Z05, 70G45, 70G65
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15863