Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bialy, Filip, Elliot, Mark, Meckin, Robert
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18233
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915506956533760
author Bialy, Filip
Elliot, Mark
Meckin, Robert
author_facet Bialy, Filip
Elliot, Mark
Meckin, Robert
contents This paper offers a domain-mediated comparative review of 251 studies on public attitudes toward AI, published between 2011 and 2025. Drawing on a systematic literature review, we analyse how different factors including perceived benefits and concerns (or risks) shape public acceptance of - or resistance to - artificial intelligence across domains and use-cases, including healthcare, education, security, public administration, generative AI, and autonomous vehicles. The analysis highlights recurring patterns in individual, contextual, and technical factors influencing perception, while also tracing variations in institutional trust, perceived fairness, and ethical concerns. We show that the public perception in AI is shaped not only by technical design or performance but also by sector-specific considerations as well as imaginaries, cultural narratives, and historical legacies. This comparative approach offers a foundation for developing more tailored and context-sensitive strategies for responsible AI governance.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_18233
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Perceptions of AI Across Sectors: A Comparative Review of Public Attitudes
Bialy, Filip
Elliot, Mark
Meckin, Robert
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
This paper offers a domain-mediated comparative review of 251 studies on public attitudes toward AI, published between 2011 and 2025. Drawing on a systematic literature review, we analyse how different factors including perceived benefits and concerns (or risks) shape public acceptance of - or resistance to - artificial intelligence across domains and use-cases, including healthcare, education, security, public administration, generative AI, and autonomous vehicles. The analysis highlights recurring patterns in individual, contextual, and technical factors influencing perception, while also tracing variations in institutional trust, perceived fairness, and ethical concerns. We show that the public perception in AI is shaped not only by technical design or performance but also by sector-specific considerations as well as imaginaries, cultural narratives, and historical legacies. This comparative approach offers a foundation for developing more tailored and context-sensitive strategies for responsible AI governance.
title Perceptions of AI Across Sectors: A Comparative Review of Public Attitudes
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18233