The Illusion of Readiness in Health AI

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Gu, Yu, Fu, Jingjing, Liu, Xiaodong, Valanarasu, Jeya Maria Jose, Codella, Noel CF, Tan, Reuben, Liu, Qianchu, Jin, Ying, Zhang, Sheng, Wang, Jinyu, Wang, Rui, Song, Lei, Qin, Guanghui, Usuyama, Naoto, Wong, Cliff, Cheng, Hao, Lee, HoHin, Sanapathi, Praneeth, Hilado, Sarah, Naumann, Tristan, Alvarez-Valle, Javier, Bian, Jiang, Wei, Mu, Malik, Khalil, Zhou, Lidong, Gao, Jianfeng, Horvitz, Eric, Lungren, Matthew P., Burger, Doug, Topol, Eric, Poon, Hoifung, Vozila, Paul
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866909957381685248
author Gu, Yu
Fu, Jingjing
Liu, Xiaodong
Valanarasu, Jeya Maria Jose
Codella, Noel CF
Tan, Reuben
Liu, Qianchu
Jin, Ying
Zhang, Sheng
Wang, Jinyu
Wang, Rui
Song, Lei
Qin, Guanghui
Usuyama, Naoto
Wong, Cliff
Cheng, Hao
Lee, HoHin
Sanapathi, Praneeth
Hilado, Sarah
Naumann, Tristan
Alvarez-Valle, Javier
Bian, Jiang
Wei, Mu
Malik, Khalil
Zhou, Lidong
Gao, Jianfeng
Horvitz, Eric
Lungren, Matthew P.
Burger, Doug
Topol, Eric
Poon, Hoifung
Vozila, Paul
author_facet Gu, Yu
Fu, Jingjing
Liu, Xiaodong
Valanarasu, Jeya Maria Jose
Codella, Noel CF
Tan, Reuben
Liu, Qianchu
Jin, Ying
Zhang, Sheng
Wang, Jinyu
Wang, Rui
Song, Lei
Qin, Guanghui
Usuyama, Naoto
Wong, Cliff
Cheng, Hao
Lee, HoHin
Sanapathi, Praneeth
Hilado, Sarah
Naumann, Tristan
Alvarez-Valle, Javier
Bian, Jiang
Wei, Mu
Malik, Khalil
Zhou, Lidong
Gao, Jianfeng
Horvitz, Eric
Lungren, Matthew P.
Burger, Doug
Topol, Eric
Poon, Hoifung
Vozila, Paul
contents Large language models have demonstrated remarkable performance in a wide range of medical benchmarks. Yet underneath the seemingly promising results lie salient growth areas, especially in cutting-edge frontiers such as multimodal reasoning. In this paper, we introduce a series of adversarial stress tests to systematically assess the robustness of flagship models and medical benchmarks. Our study reveals prevalent brittleness in the presence of simple adversarial transformations: leading systems can guess the right answer even with key inputs removed, yet may get confused by the slightest prompt alterations, while fabricating convincing yet flawed reasoning traces. Using clinician-guided rubrics, we demonstrate that popular medical benchmarks vary widely in what they truly measure. Our study reveals significant competency gaps of frontier AI in attaining real-world readiness for health applications. If we want AI to earn trust in healthcare, we must demand more than leaderboard wins and must hold AI systems accountable to ensure robustness, sound reasoning, and alignment with real medical demands.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_18234
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The Illusion of Readiness in Health AI
Gu, Yu
Fu, Jingjing
Liu, Xiaodong
Valanarasu, Jeya Maria Jose
Codella, Noel CF
Tan, Reuben
Liu, Qianchu
Jin, Ying
Zhang, Sheng
Wang, Jinyu
Wang, Rui
Song, Lei
Qin, Guanghui
Usuyama, Naoto
Wong, Cliff
Cheng, Hao
Lee, HoHin
Sanapathi, Praneeth
Hilado, Sarah
Naumann, Tristan
Alvarez-Valle, Javier
Bian, Jiang
Wei, Mu
Malik, Khalil
Zhou, Lidong
Gao, Jianfeng
Horvitz, Eric
Lungren, Matthew P.
Burger, Doug
Topol, Eric
Poon, Hoifung
Vozila, Paul
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Large language models have demonstrated remarkable performance in a wide range of medical benchmarks. Yet underneath the seemingly promising results lie salient growth areas, especially in cutting-edge frontiers such as multimodal reasoning. In this paper, we introduce a series of adversarial stress tests to systematically assess the robustness of flagship models and medical benchmarks. Our study reveals prevalent brittleness in the presence of simple adversarial transformations: leading systems can guess the right answer even with key inputs removed, yet may get confused by the slightest prompt alterations, while fabricating convincing yet flawed reasoning traces. Using clinician-guided rubrics, we demonstrate that popular medical benchmarks vary widely in what they truly measure. Our study reveals significant competency gaps of frontier AI in attaining real-world readiness for health applications. If we want AI to earn trust in healthcare, we must demand more than leaderboard wins and must hold AI systems accountable to ensure robustness, sound reasoning, and alignment with real medical demands.
title The Illusion of Readiness in Health AI
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18234