The Inverse Function Fallacy: On Sign Determination and Forgotten Fundamentals
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866917213539139584 |
|---|---|
| author | Yorulmazlar, Meliksah |
| author_facet | Yorulmazlar, Meliksah |
| contents | Although inverse functions are introduced early in algebra, many students remain unaware that an inverse expression may legitimately involve a negative root. Instead, they default to assuming a positive root, overlooking the role of domain restrictions in determining the correct solution. This paper identifies this misconception as the "inverse function fallacy" and introduces a systematic approach, the Inverse Function Point method, that establishes sign determination to a single domain-based reference point. In a study of 69 STEM students at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, only 19% solved a sign-determination problem correctly on their first attempt. Those students were not re-tested. Of the remaining 56 who answered incorrectly, I was able to re-test 40 after teaching the proposed method. In this subgroup, accuracy rose to 80%. These results highlight both the fragility of assumed mathematical knowledge and the potential of simple, intuitive procedures to reinforce conceptual understanding. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_19357 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Inverse Function Fallacy: On Sign Determination and Forgotten Fundamentals Yorulmazlar, Meliksah History and Overview 97D40, 26A09 97D40, 26A0997D40, 26A09 97D40, 26A09 97D40, 26A09 Although inverse functions are introduced early in algebra, many students remain unaware that an inverse expression may legitimately involve a negative root. Instead, they default to assuming a positive root, overlooking the role of domain restrictions in determining the correct solution. This paper identifies this misconception as the "inverse function fallacy" and introduces a systematic approach, the Inverse Function Point method, that establishes sign determination to a single domain-based reference point. In a study of 69 STEM students at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, only 19% solved a sign-determination problem correctly on their first attempt. Those students were not re-tested. Of the remaining 56 who answered incorrectly, I was able to re-test 40 after teaching the proposed method. In this subgroup, accuracy rose to 80%. These results highlight both the fragility of assumed mathematical knowledge and the potential of simple, intuitive procedures to reinforce conceptual understanding. |
| title | The Inverse Function Fallacy: On Sign Determination and Forgotten Fundamentals |
| topic | History and Overview 97D40, 26A09 97D40, 26A0997D40, 26A09 97D40, 26A09 97D40, 26A09 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19357 |