A More Realistic Evaluation of Cross-Frequency Transfer Learning and Foundation Forecasting Models

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Olivares, Kin G., Wolff, Malcolm, Konstantinova, Tatiana, Ramasubramanian, Shankar, Oreshkin, Boris, Wilson, Andrew Gordon, Potapczynski, Andres, Potosnak, Willa, Mahoney, Michael W., Cao, Mengfei, Efimov, Dmitry
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866912715942920192
author Olivares, Kin G.
Wolff, Malcolm
Konstantinova, Tatiana
Ramasubramanian, Shankar
Oreshkin, Boris
Wilson, Andrew Gordon
Potapczynski, Andres
Potosnak, Willa
Mahoney, Michael W.
Cao, Mengfei
Efimov, Dmitry
author_facet Olivares, Kin G.
Wolff, Malcolm
Konstantinova, Tatiana
Ramasubramanian, Shankar
Oreshkin, Boris
Wilson, Andrew Gordon
Potapczynski, Andres
Potosnak, Willa
Mahoney, Michael W.
Cao, Mengfei
Efimov, Dmitry
contents Cross-frequency transfer learning (CFTL) has emerged as a popular framework for curating large-scale time series datasets to pre-train foundation forecasting models (FFMs). Although CFTL has shown promise, current benchmarking practices fall short of accurately assessing its performance. This shortcoming stems from many factors: an over-reliance on small-scale evaluation datasets; inadequate treatment of sample size when computing summary statistics; reporting of suboptimal statistical models; and failing to account for non-negligible risks of overlap between pre-training and test datasets. To address these limitations, we introduce a unified reimplementation of widely-adopted neural forecasting networks, adapting them for the CFTL setup; we pre-train only on proprietary and synthetic data, being careful to prevent test leakage; and we evaluate on 15 large, diverse public forecast competition datasets. Our empirical analysis reveals that statistical models' accuracy is frequently underreported. Notably, we confirm that statistical models and their ensembles consistently outperform existing FFMs by more than 8.2% in sCRPS, and by more than 20% MASE, across datasets. However, we also find that synthetic dataset pre-training does improve the accuracy of a FFM by 7% percent.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_19465
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A More Realistic Evaluation of Cross-Frequency Transfer Learning and Foundation Forecasting Models
Olivares, Kin G.
Wolff, Malcolm
Konstantinova, Tatiana
Ramasubramanian, Shankar
Oreshkin, Boris
Wilson, Andrew Gordon
Potapczynski, Andres
Potosnak, Willa
Mahoney, Michael W.
Cao, Mengfei
Efimov, Dmitry
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Applications
Cross-frequency transfer learning (CFTL) has emerged as a popular framework for curating large-scale time series datasets to pre-train foundation forecasting models (FFMs). Although CFTL has shown promise, current benchmarking practices fall short of accurately assessing its performance. This shortcoming stems from many factors: an over-reliance on small-scale evaluation datasets; inadequate treatment of sample size when computing summary statistics; reporting of suboptimal statistical models; and failing to account for non-negligible risks of overlap between pre-training and test datasets. To address these limitations, we introduce a unified reimplementation of widely-adopted neural forecasting networks, adapting them for the CFTL setup; we pre-train only on proprietary and synthetic data, being careful to prevent test leakage; and we evaluate on 15 large, diverse public forecast competition datasets. Our empirical analysis reveals that statistical models' accuracy is frequently underreported. Notably, we confirm that statistical models and their ensembles consistently outperform existing FFMs by more than 8.2% in sCRPS, and by more than 20% MASE, across datasets. However, we also find that synthetic dataset pre-training does improve the accuracy of a FFM by 7% percent.
title A More Realistic Evaluation of Cross-Frequency Transfer Learning and Foundation Forecasting Models
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19465