Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Narra, Bhanu, Read, James, Krátký, Matěj
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21159
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913028152229888
author Narra, Bhanu
Read, James
Krátký, Matěj
author_facet Narra, Bhanu
Read, James
Krátký, Matěj
contents String field theory is supposed to stand to perturbative string theory as quantum field theory stands to single-particle quantum theory; as such, it purports to offer a substantially more general and powerful perspective on string theory than the perturbative approach. In addition, string field theory has been claimed for several decades to liberate string theory from any fixed, background spatiotemporal commitments -- thereby (if true) rendering it `background independent'. But is this really so? In this article, we undertake a detailed interrogation of this claim, finding that the verdict is sensitive both to one's understanding of the notion of background independence, and also to how one understands string field theory itself. Although in the end our verdicts on the question of the background independence are therefore somewhat mixed, we hope that our study will elevate the levels of systematicity and rigour in these discussions, as well as equip philosophers of physics with a helpful introduction to string field theory and the variety of interesting conceptual questions which it raises.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_21159
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Is string field theory background independent?
Narra, Bhanu
Read, James
Krátký, Matěj
History and Philosophy of Physics
High Energy Physics - Theory
String field theory is supposed to stand to perturbative string theory as quantum field theory stands to single-particle quantum theory; as such, it purports to offer a substantially more general and powerful perspective on string theory than the perturbative approach. In addition, string field theory has been claimed for several decades to liberate string theory from any fixed, background spatiotemporal commitments -- thereby (if true) rendering it `background independent'. But is this really so? In this article, we undertake a detailed interrogation of this claim, finding that the verdict is sensitive both to one's understanding of the notion of background independence, and also to how one understands string field theory itself. Although in the end our verdicts on the question of the background independence are therefore somewhat mixed, we hope that our study will elevate the levels of systematicity and rigour in these discussions, as well as equip philosophers of physics with a helpful introduction to string field theory and the variety of interesting conceptual questions which it raises.
title Is string field theory background independent?
topic History and Philosophy of Physics
High Energy Physics - Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21159