Cover Image

What Drives Paper Acceptance? A Process-Centric Analysis of Modern Peer Review

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jung, Sangkeun, Pyeon, Goun, Heo, Inbum, Ahn, Hyungjin
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Computers and Society
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

LED: A Benchmark for Evaluating Layout Error Detection in Document Analysis
by: Heo, Inbum, et al.
Published: (2026)

Evaluating Large Language Models on the 2026 Korean CSAT Mathematics Exam: Measuring Mathematical Ability in a Zero-Data-Leakage Setting
by: Pyeon, Goun, et al.
Published: (2025)

LED Benchmark: Diagnosing Structural Layout Errors for Document Layout Analysis
by: Heo, Inbum, et al.
Published: (2025)

The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates
by: Latona, Giuseppe Russo, et al.
Published: (2024)

Causal Analysis of Author Demographics in Academic Peer Review
by: Oyshi, Uttamasha Anjally, et al.
Published: (2026)

Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process
by: Kargaran, Amir Hossein, et al.
Published: (2025)

AI and the Future of Academic Peer Review
by: Mann, Sebastian Porsdam, et al.
Published: (2025)

What Drives Students' Use of AI Chatbots? Technology Acceptance in Conversational AI
by: Pitts, Griffin, et al.
Published: (2026)

AI-Augmented Peer Review and Scientific Productivity: A Cross-Country Panel and SEM Analysis
by: Han, Dongsoo
Published: (2026)

Position on LLM-Assisted Peer Review: Addressing Reviewer Gap through Mentoring and Feedback
by: Yun, JungMin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers
by: Paul, Uchswas, et al.
Published: (2025)

Reviewing the Reviewer: Elevating Peer Review Quality through LLM-Guided Feedback
by: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Published: (2026)

BeerReview: A Blockchain-enabled Peer Review Platform
by: Jin, Guodong, et al.
Published: (2024)

Dispute Resolution in Peer Review with Abstract Argumentation and OWL DL
by: Baimuratov, Ildar, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Systematic Review on Process Mining for Curricular Analysis
by: Calegari, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2024)

Benchmark on Peer Review Toxic Detection: A Challenging Task with a New Dataset
by: Luo, Man, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
by: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Sentiment Analysis of Airbnb Reviews: Exploring Their Impact on Acceptance Rates and Pricing Across Multiple U.S. Regions
by: Safari, Ali
Published: (2025)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)

DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
by: Weng, Yixuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Scaling Success: A Systematic Review of Peer Grading Strategies for Accuracy, Efficiency, and Learning in Contemporary Education
by: Paul, Uchswas, et al.
Published: (2025)

Understanding and Supporting Peer Review Using AI-reframed Positive Summary
by: Yang, Chi-Lan, et al.
Published: (2025)

When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review
by: Zhu, Changjia, et al.
Published: (2025)

Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
by: Kim, Jaeho, et al.
Published: (2025)

Validating an Instrument for Teachers' Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Education
by: Guo, Shuchen, et al.
Published: (2024)

Students' Acceptance of Arduino Technology Integration in Student-Led Science Inquiry: Insights from the Technology Acceptance Model
by: Ga, Seok-Hyun, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can Large Language Models Be Trusted Paper Reviewers? A Feasibility Study
by: Li, Chuanlei, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors
by: Sadallah, Abdelrahman, et al.
Published: (2025)

Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews
by: Vasu, Sai Suresh Macharla, et al.
Published: (2025)

Do LLMs Favor LLMs? Quantifying Interaction Effects in Peer Review
by: Sharma, Vibhhu, et al.
Published: (2026)

Driving Education Advancements of Novice Drivers: A Systematic Literature Review
by: Tusti, Anannya Ghosh, et al.
Published: (2025)

Assessing Age Assurance Technologies: Effectiveness, Side-Effects, and Acceptance
by: Lueks, Wouter, et al.
Published: (2026)

Emerging Media Use and Acceptance of Digital Immortality: A Cluster Analysis among Chinese Young Generations
by: Mou, Yi, et al.
Published: (2025)

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review
by: Lin, Zhicheng
Published: (2025)

A Principled Approach to Randomized Selection under Uncertainty: Applications to Peer Review and Grant Funding
by: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can AI Solve the Peer Review Crisis? A Large Scale Cross Model Experiment of LLMs' Performance and Biases in Evaluating over 1000 Economics Papers
by: Pataranutaporn, Pat, et al.
Published: (2025)

Generative AI in Knowledge Work: Perception, Usefulness, and Acceptance of Microsoft 365 Copilot
by: Schmidt, Carsten F., et al.
Published: (2026)

Research on Jing Dong's Self-built Logistics Based on Technology Acceptance Model
by: Wang, Yunsheng, et al.
Published: (2024)

Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process
by: Yang, Jing
Published: (2025)

ZEBRA: Leveraging Model-Behavioral Knowledge for Zero-Annotation Preference Dataset Construction
by: Jung, Jeesu, et al.
Published: (2025)