Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keon, Matt, Karim, Aabid, Lohana, Bhoomika, Karim, Abdul, Nguyen, Thai, Hamilton, Tara, Abbas, Ali
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25767
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916979338641408
author Keon, Matt
Karim, Aabid
Lohana, Bhoomika
Karim, Abdul
Nguyen, Thai
Hamilton, Tara
Abbas, Ali
author_facet Keon, Matt
Karim, Aabid
Lohana, Bhoomika
Karim, Abdul
Nguyen, Thai
Hamilton, Tara
Abbas, Ali
contents Large language models (LLMs) generate fluent text yet often default to safe, generic phrasing, raising doubts about their ability to handle creativity. We formalize this tendency as a Galton-style regression to the mean in language and evaluate it using a creativity stress test in advertising concepts. When ad ideas were simplified step by step, creative features such as metaphors, emotions, and visual cues disappeared early, while factual content remained, showing that models favor high-probability information. When asked to regenerate from simplified inputs, models produced longer outputs with lexical variety but failed to recover the depth and distinctiveness of the originals. We combined quantitative comparisons with qualitative analysis, which revealed that the regenerated texts often appeared novel but lacked true originality. Providing ad-specific cues such as metaphors, emotional hooks and visual markers improved alignment and stylistic balance, though outputs still relied on familiar tropes. Taken together, the findings show that without targeted guidance, LLMs drift towards mediocrity in creative tasks; structured signals can partially counter this tendency and point towards pathways for developing creativity-sensitive models.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_25767
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Galton's Law of Mediocrity: Why Large Language Models Regress to the Mean and Fail at Creativity in Advertising
Keon, Matt
Karim, Aabid
Lohana, Bhoomika
Karim, Abdul
Nguyen, Thai
Hamilton, Tara
Abbas, Ali
Artificial Intelligence
Large language models (LLMs) generate fluent text yet often default to safe, generic phrasing, raising doubts about their ability to handle creativity. We formalize this tendency as a Galton-style regression to the mean in language and evaluate it using a creativity stress test in advertising concepts. When ad ideas were simplified step by step, creative features such as metaphors, emotions, and visual cues disappeared early, while factual content remained, showing that models favor high-probability information. When asked to regenerate from simplified inputs, models produced longer outputs with lexical variety but failed to recover the depth and distinctiveness of the originals. We combined quantitative comparisons with qualitative analysis, which revealed that the regenerated texts often appeared novel but lacked true originality. Providing ad-specific cues such as metaphors, emotional hooks and visual markers improved alignment and stylistic balance, though outputs still relied on familiar tropes. Taken together, the findings show that without targeted guidance, LLMs drift towards mediocrity in creative tasks; structured signals can partially counter this tendency and point towards pathways for developing creativity-sensitive models.
title Galton's Law of Mediocrity: Why Large Language Models Regress to the Mean and Fail at Creativity in Advertising
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25767