MuSLR: Multimodal Symbolic Logical Reasoning

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Jundong, Fei, Hao, Zhang, Yuhui, Pan, Liangming, Huang, Qijun, Liu, Qian, Nakov, Preslav, Kan, Min-Yen, Wang, William Yang, Lee, Mong-Li, Hsu, Wynne
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866917229569769472
author Xu, Jundong
Fei, Hao
Zhang, Yuhui
Pan, Liangming
Huang, Qijun
Liu, Qian
Nakov, Preslav
Kan, Min-Yen
Wang, William Yang
Lee, Mong-Li
Hsu, Wynne
author_facet Xu, Jundong
Fei, Hao
Zhang, Yuhui
Pan, Liangming
Huang, Qijun
Liu, Qian
Nakov, Preslav
Kan, Min-Yen
Wang, William Yang
Lee, Mong-Li
Hsu, Wynne
contents Multimodal symbolic logical reasoning, which aims to deduce new facts from multimodal input via formal logic, is critical in high-stakes applications such as autonomous driving and medical diagnosis, as its rigorous, deterministic reasoning helps prevent serious consequences. To evaluate such capabilities of current state-of-the-art vision language models (VLMs), we introduce the first benchmark MuSLR for multimodal symbolic logical reasoning grounded in formal logical rules. MuSLR comprises 1,093 instances across 7 domains, including 35 atomic symbolic logic and 976 logical combinations, with reasoning depths ranging from 2 to 9. We evaluate 7 state-of-the-art VLMs on MuSLR and find that they all struggle with multimodal symbolic reasoning, with the best model, GPT-4.1, achieving only 46.8%. Thus, we propose LogiCAM, a modular framework that applies formal logical rules to multimodal inputs, boosting GPT-4.1's Chain-of-Thought performance by 14.13%, and delivering even larger gains on complex logics such as first-order logic. We also conduct a comprehensive error analysis, showing that around 70% of failures stem from logical misalignment between modalities, offering key insights to guide future improvements. All data and code are publicly available at https://llm-symbol.github.io/MuSLR.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_25851
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle MuSLR: Multimodal Symbolic Logical Reasoning
Xu, Jundong
Fei, Hao
Zhang, Yuhui
Pan, Liangming
Huang, Qijun
Liu, Qian
Nakov, Preslav
Kan, Min-Yen
Wang, William Yang
Lee, Mong-Li
Hsu, Wynne
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Multimodal symbolic logical reasoning, which aims to deduce new facts from multimodal input via formal logic, is critical in high-stakes applications such as autonomous driving and medical diagnosis, as its rigorous, deterministic reasoning helps prevent serious consequences. To evaluate such capabilities of current state-of-the-art vision language models (VLMs), we introduce the first benchmark MuSLR for multimodal symbolic logical reasoning grounded in formal logical rules. MuSLR comprises 1,093 instances across 7 domains, including 35 atomic symbolic logic and 976 logical combinations, with reasoning depths ranging from 2 to 9. We evaluate 7 state-of-the-art VLMs on MuSLR and find that they all struggle with multimodal symbolic reasoning, with the best model, GPT-4.1, achieving only 46.8%. Thus, we propose LogiCAM, a modular framework that applies formal logical rules to multimodal inputs, boosting GPT-4.1's Chain-of-Thought performance by 14.13%, and delivering even larger gains on complex logics such as first-order logic. We also conduct a comprehensive error analysis, showing that around 70% of failures stem from logical misalignment between modalities, offering key insights to guide future improvements. All data and code are publicly available at https://llm-symbol.github.io/MuSLR.
title MuSLR: Multimodal Symbolic Logical Reasoning
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25851