Probeless vs Probe-Based Variable-Strength Eavesdropping in Quantum Key Distribution

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Idan, Yuval, Gofman, Tal, Abelson, Ziv, Cestier, Isabelle, Mentovich, Elad, Cohen, Eliahu
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912617416622080
author Idan, Yuval
Gofman, Tal
Abelson, Ziv
Cestier, Isabelle
Mentovich, Elad
Cohen, Eliahu
author_facet Idan, Yuval
Gofman, Tal
Abelson, Ziv
Cestier, Isabelle
Mentovich, Elad
Cohen, Eliahu
contents Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a provably secure way of generating a secret key, which can later be used for encoding and decoding information. In this paper we analyze the effects of an eavesdropper's variable-strength measurements on QKD. Two types of measurements have been considered: (i) a probe-based model, commonly referred to as a "weak measurement", in which each qubit is weakly coupled to a continuous variable probe which is later projectively measured (ii) a probeless model, usually referred to as a "partial measurement", where only a small (tunable) part of all transmitted photons is projectively measured and the rest are transmitted with no disturbance. The information gain of the eavesdropper and the quantum-bit-error-rate (QBER) are computed for each case. An experimental realization of an intercept-and-resend attack based on variable-strength partial measurements is demonstrated in a time-bin-encoded, fiber-based simplified Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, which is compatible with data centers. It is shown that the measured information gain and QBER follow the theoretical curves across the full coupling range, validating the partial-measurement model and clarifying its relation to the well-known monitoring channel. Further attacks involving photon number splitting and noise injection during the calibration stage are also analyzed. The results highlight the theoretical differences between weak and partial measurements, while also demonstrating the practicality of probeless eavesdropping in the case of real-world QKD systems.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_25890
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Probeless vs Probe-Based Variable-Strength Eavesdropping in Quantum Key Distribution
Idan, Yuval
Gofman, Tal
Abelson, Ziv
Cestier, Isabelle
Mentovich, Elad
Cohen, Eliahu
Quantum Physics
Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a provably secure way of generating a secret key, which can later be used for encoding and decoding information. In this paper we analyze the effects of an eavesdropper's variable-strength measurements on QKD. Two types of measurements have been considered: (i) a probe-based model, commonly referred to as a "weak measurement", in which each qubit is weakly coupled to a continuous variable probe which is later projectively measured (ii) a probeless model, usually referred to as a "partial measurement", where only a small (tunable) part of all transmitted photons is projectively measured and the rest are transmitted with no disturbance. The information gain of the eavesdropper and the quantum-bit-error-rate (QBER) are computed for each case. An experimental realization of an intercept-and-resend attack based on variable-strength partial measurements is demonstrated in a time-bin-encoded, fiber-based simplified Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, which is compatible with data centers. It is shown that the measured information gain and QBER follow the theoretical curves across the full coupling range, validating the partial-measurement model and clarifying its relation to the well-known monitoring channel. Further attacks involving photon number splitting and noise injection during the calibration stage are also analyzed. The results highlight the theoretical differences between weak and partial measurements, while also demonstrating the practicality of probeless eavesdropping in the case of real-world QKD systems.
title Probeless vs Probe-Based Variable-Strength Eavesdropping in Quantum Key Distribution
topic Quantum Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25890