Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26100 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866909040770023424 |
|---|---|
| author | Wang, Yixu Wang, Xin Yao, Yang Li, Xinyuan Yang, Xibang Teng, Yan Ma, Xingjun Wang, Yingchun |
| author_facet | Wang, Yixu Wang, Xin Yao, Yang Li, Xinyuan Yang, Xibang Teng, Yan Ma, Xingjun Wang, Yingchun |
| contents | The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into high-stakes domains necessitates reliable safety and compliance evaluation. However, existing static benchmarks are ill-equipped to address the dynamic nature of AI risks and evolving regulations, creating a critical safety gap. This paper introduces a new paradigm of agentic safety evaluation, reframing evaluation as a continuous and self-evolving process rather than a one-time audit. We then propose a novel multi-agent framework AgenticEval, which autonomously ingests unstructured policy documents to generate and perpetually evolve a comprehensive safety benchmark. AgenticEval leverages a synergistic pipeline of specialized agents and incorporates a Self-evolving Evaluation loop, where the system learns from evaluation results to craft progressively more sophisticated and targeted test cases. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of AgenticEval, showing a consistent decline in model safety as the evaluation hardens. For instance, GPT-5's safety rate on the EU AI Act drops from 72.50% to 36.36% over successive iterations. These findings reveal the limitations of static assessments and highlight our framework's ability to uncover deep vulnerabilities missed by traditional methods, underscoring the urgent need for dynamic evaluation ecosystems to ensure the safe and responsible deployment of advanced AI. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2509_26100 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | AgenticEval: Toward Agentic and Self-Evolving Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models Wang, Yixu Wang, Xin Yao, Yang Li, Xinyuan Yang, Xibang Teng, Yan Ma, Xingjun Wang, Yingchun Artificial Intelligence The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into high-stakes domains necessitates reliable safety and compliance evaluation. However, existing static benchmarks are ill-equipped to address the dynamic nature of AI risks and evolving regulations, creating a critical safety gap. This paper introduces a new paradigm of agentic safety evaluation, reframing evaluation as a continuous and self-evolving process rather than a one-time audit. We then propose a novel multi-agent framework AgenticEval, which autonomously ingests unstructured policy documents to generate and perpetually evolve a comprehensive safety benchmark. AgenticEval leverages a synergistic pipeline of specialized agents and incorporates a Self-evolving Evaluation loop, where the system learns from evaluation results to craft progressively more sophisticated and targeted test cases. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of AgenticEval, showing a consistent decline in model safety as the evaluation hardens. For instance, GPT-5's safety rate on the EU AI Act drops from 72.50% to 36.36% over successive iterations. These findings reveal the limitations of static assessments and highlight our framework's ability to uncover deep vulnerabilities missed by traditional methods, underscoring the urgent need for dynamic evaluation ecosystems to ensure the safe and responsible deployment of advanced AI. |
| title | AgenticEval: Toward Agentic and Self-Evolving Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26100 |