Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Yucheng, Zając, Hubert Dariusz, Cheplygina, Veronika, Jiménez-Sánchez, Amelia
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866918524258091008
author Lu, Yucheng
Zając, Hubert Dariusz
Cheplygina, Veronika
Jiménez-Sánchez, Amelia
author_facet Lu, Yucheng
Zając, Hubert Dariusz
Cheplygina, Veronika
Jiménez-Sánchez, Amelia
contents Transfer learning is crucial for medical imaging, yet the selection of source datasets often relies on researchers' intuition rather than systematic principles, which can impact the generalizability of algorithms and, thus, patient outcomes. This study investigates these decisions through a task-based survey with machine learning practitioners. Unlike prior work that benchmarks models and experimental setups, we take a human-computer interaction (HCI) perspective on how practitioners select source datasets. Our findings indicate that choices are task-dependent and influenced by community practices, dataset properties, and computational (data embedding), or perceived visual or semantic similarity. However, similarity ratings and expected performance are not always aligned, challenging a traditional "more similar is better" view. Moreover, ethical and fairness considerations remain largely absent from source dataset sections. Participants often used ambiguous terminology, which suggests a need for clearer definitions and tools to make them explicit and usable. By clarifying these heuristics and introducing a conceptual framework of transfer learning factors, this work provides practical insights for more systematic source selection in transfer learning.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_00902
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification
Lu, Yucheng
Zając, Hubert Dariusz
Cheplygina, Veronika
Jiménez-Sánchez, Amelia
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
Transfer learning is crucial for medical imaging, yet the selection of source datasets often relies on researchers' intuition rather than systematic principles, which can impact the generalizability of algorithms and, thus, patient outcomes. This study investigates these decisions through a task-based survey with machine learning practitioners. Unlike prior work that benchmarks models and experimental setups, we take a human-computer interaction (HCI) perspective on how practitioners select source datasets. Our findings indicate that choices are task-dependent and influenced by community practices, dataset properties, and computational (data embedding), or perceived visual or semantic similarity. However, similarity ratings and expected performance are not always aligned, challenging a traditional "more similar is better" view. Moreover, ethical and fairness considerations remain largely absent from source dataset sections. Participants often used ambiguous terminology, which suggests a need for clearer definitions and tools to make them explicit and usable. By clarifying these heuristics and introducing a conceptual framework of transfer learning factors, this work provides practical insights for more systematic source selection in transfer learning.
title Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00902