Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for African Low-Resource Languages: A Systematic Literature Review
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866915528887500800 |
|---|---|
| author | Imam, Sukairaj Hafiz Belay, Tadesse Destaw Husse, Kedir Yassin Ahmad, Ibrahim Said Abdulmumin, Idris Umar, Hadiza Ali Bello, Muhammad Yahuza Nakatumba-Nabende, Joyce Yimam, Seid Muhie Muhammad, Shamsuddeen Hassan |
| author_facet | Imam, Sukairaj Hafiz Belay, Tadesse Destaw Husse, Kedir Yassin Ahmad, Ibrahim Said Abdulmumin, Idris Umar, Hadiza Ali Bello, Muhammad Yahuza Nakatumba-Nabende, Joyce Yimam, Seid Muhie Muhammad, Shamsuddeen Hassan |
| contents | ASR has achieved remarkable global progress, yet African low-resource languages remain rigorously underrepresented, producing barriers to digital inclusion across the continent with more than +2000 languages. This systematic literature review (SLR) explores research on ASR for African languages with a focus on datasets, models and training methods, evaluation techniques, challenges, and recommends future directions. We employ the PRISMA 2020 procedures and search DBLP, ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and arXiv for studies published between January 2020 and July 2025. We include studies related to ASR datasets, models or metrics for African languages, while excluding non-African, duplicates, and low-quality studies (score <3/5). We screen 71 out of 2,062 records and we record a total of 74 datasets across 111 languages, encompassing approximately 11,206 hours of speech. Fewer than 15% of research provided reproducible materials, and dataset licensing is not clear. Self-supervised and transfer learning techniques are promising, but are hindered by limited pre-training data, inadequate coverage of dialects, and the availability of resources. Most of the researchers use Word Error Rate (WER), with very minimal use of linguistically informed scores such as Character Error Rate (CER) or Diacritic Error Rate (DER), and thus with limited application in tonal and morphologically rich languages. The existing evidence on ASR systems is inconsistent, hindered by issues like dataset availability, poor annotations, licensing uncertainties, and limited benchmarking. Nevertheless, the rise of community-driven initiatives and methodological advancements indicates a pathway for improvement. Sustainable development for this area will also include stakeholder partnership, creation of ethically well-balanced datasets, use of lightweight modelling techniques, and active benchmarking. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_01145 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for African Low-Resource Languages: A Systematic Literature Review Imam, Sukairaj Hafiz Belay, Tadesse Destaw Husse, Kedir Yassin Ahmad, Ibrahim Said Abdulmumin, Idris Umar, Hadiza Ali Bello, Muhammad Yahuza Nakatumba-Nabende, Joyce Yimam, Seid Muhie Muhammad, Shamsuddeen Hassan Computation and Language ASR has achieved remarkable global progress, yet African low-resource languages remain rigorously underrepresented, producing barriers to digital inclusion across the continent with more than +2000 languages. This systematic literature review (SLR) explores research on ASR for African languages with a focus on datasets, models and training methods, evaluation techniques, challenges, and recommends future directions. We employ the PRISMA 2020 procedures and search DBLP, ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and arXiv for studies published between January 2020 and July 2025. We include studies related to ASR datasets, models or metrics for African languages, while excluding non-African, duplicates, and low-quality studies (score <3/5). We screen 71 out of 2,062 records and we record a total of 74 datasets across 111 languages, encompassing approximately 11,206 hours of speech. Fewer than 15% of research provided reproducible materials, and dataset licensing is not clear. Self-supervised and transfer learning techniques are promising, but are hindered by limited pre-training data, inadequate coverage of dialects, and the availability of resources. Most of the researchers use Word Error Rate (WER), with very minimal use of linguistically informed scores such as Character Error Rate (CER) or Diacritic Error Rate (DER), and thus with limited application in tonal and morphologically rich languages. The existing evidence on ASR systems is inconsistent, hindered by issues like dataset availability, poor annotations, licensing uncertainties, and limited benchmarking. Nevertheless, the rise of community-driven initiatives and methodological advancements indicates a pathway for improvement. Sustainable development for this area will also include stakeholder partnership, creation of ethically well-balanced datasets, use of lightweight modelling techniques, and active benchmarking. |
| title | Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for African Low-Resource Languages: A Systematic Literature Review |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01145 |