Longitudinal Monitoring of LLM Content Moderation of Social Issues

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dai, Yunlang, Lurie, Emma, Metaxa, Danaé, Friedler, Sorelle A.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914071260954624
author Dai, Yunlang
Lurie, Emma
Metaxa, Danaé
Friedler, Sorelle A.
author_facet Dai, Yunlang
Lurie, Emma
Metaxa, Danaé
Friedler, Sorelle A.
contents Large language models' (LLMs') outputs are shaped by opaque and frequently-changing company content moderation policies and practices. LLM moderation often takes the form of refusal; models' refusal to produce text about certain topics both reflects company policy and subtly shapes public discourse. We introduce AI Watchman, a longitudinal auditing system to publicly measure and track LLM refusals over time, to provide transparency into an important and black-box aspect of LLMs. Using a dataset of over 400 social issues, we audit Open AI's moderation endpoint, GPT-4.1, and GPT-5, and DeepSeek (both in English and Chinese). We find evidence that changes in company policies, even those not publicly announced, can be detected by AI Watchman, and identify company- and model-specific differences in content moderation. We also qualitatively analyze and categorize different forms of refusal. This work contributes evidence for the value of longitudinal auditing of LLMs, and AI Watchman, one system for doing so.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_01255
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Longitudinal Monitoring of LLM Content Moderation of Social Issues
Dai, Yunlang
Lurie, Emma
Metaxa, Danaé
Friedler, Sorelle A.
Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
Large language models' (LLMs') outputs are shaped by opaque and frequently-changing company content moderation policies and practices. LLM moderation often takes the form of refusal; models' refusal to produce text about certain topics both reflects company policy and subtly shapes public discourse. We introduce AI Watchman, a longitudinal auditing system to publicly measure and track LLM refusals over time, to provide transparency into an important and black-box aspect of LLMs. Using a dataset of over 400 social issues, we audit Open AI's moderation endpoint, GPT-4.1, and GPT-5, and DeepSeek (both in English and Chinese). We find evidence that changes in company policies, even those not publicly announced, can be detected by AI Watchman, and identify company- and model-specific differences in content moderation. We also qualitatively analyze and categorize different forms of refusal. This work contributes evidence for the value of longitudinal auditing of LLMs, and AI Watchman, one system for doing so.
title Longitudinal Monitoring of LLM Content Moderation of Social Issues
topic Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01255