From Local Earthquake Nowcasting to Natural Time Forecasting: A Simple Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Method
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866914097800413184 |
|---|---|
| author | Rundle, John B Baughman, Ian Donnellan, Andrea Grant, Lisa Fox, Geoffrey |
| author_facet | Rundle, John B Baughman, Ian Donnellan, Andrea Grant, Lisa Fox, Geoffrey |
| contents | Previous papers have outlined nowcasting methods to track the current state of earthquake hazard using only observed seismic catalogs. The basis for one of these methods, the "counting method", is the Gutenberg-Richter (GR) magnitude-frequency relation. The GR relation states that for every large earthquake of magnitude greater than MT , there are on average NGR small earthquakes of magnitude MS. In this paper we use this basic relation, combined with the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) formalism from machine learning, to compute the probability of a large earthquake. The probability is conditioned on the number of small earthquakes n(t) that have occurred since the last large earthquake. We work in natural time, which is defined as the count of small earthquakes between large earthquakes. We do not need to assume a probability model, which is a major advantage. Instead, the probability is computed as the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) associated with the ROC curve. We find that the PPV following the last large earthquake initially decreases as more small earthquakes occur, indicating the property of temporal clustering of large earthquakes as is observed. As the number of small earthquakes continues to accumulate, the PPV subsequently begins to increase. Eventually a point is reached beyond which the rate of increase becomes much larger and more dramatic. Here we describe and illustrate the method by applying it to a local region around Los Angeles, California, following the January 17, 1994 magnitude M6.7 Northridge earthquake. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_02467 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | From Local Earthquake Nowcasting to Natural Time Forecasting: A Simple Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Method Rundle, John B Baughman, Ian Donnellan, Andrea Grant, Lisa Fox, Geoffrey Geophysics Previous papers have outlined nowcasting methods to track the current state of earthquake hazard using only observed seismic catalogs. The basis for one of these methods, the "counting method", is the Gutenberg-Richter (GR) magnitude-frequency relation. The GR relation states that for every large earthquake of magnitude greater than MT , there are on average NGR small earthquakes of magnitude MS. In this paper we use this basic relation, combined with the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) formalism from machine learning, to compute the probability of a large earthquake. The probability is conditioned on the number of small earthquakes n(t) that have occurred since the last large earthquake. We work in natural time, which is defined as the count of small earthquakes between large earthquakes. We do not need to assume a probability model, which is a major advantage. Instead, the probability is computed as the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) associated with the ROC curve. We find that the PPV following the last large earthquake initially decreases as more small earthquakes occur, indicating the property of temporal clustering of large earthquakes as is observed. As the number of small earthquakes continues to accumulate, the PPV subsequently begins to increase. Eventually a point is reached beyond which the rate of increase becomes much larger and more dramatic. Here we describe and illustrate the method by applying it to a local region around Los Angeles, California, following the January 17, 1994 magnitude M6.7 Northridge earthquake. |
| title | From Local Earthquake Nowcasting to Natural Time Forecasting: A Simple Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Method |
| topic | Geophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02467 |