Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Yuxuan, Wu, Haixu, Ma, Yuezhou, Fang, Yuchen, Zhang, Ziyi, Liu, Yong, Wang, Shiyu, Ye, Zhou, Xiang, Yang, Wang, Jianmin, Long, Mingsheng
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02729
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909010858344448
author Wang, Yuxuan
Wu, Haixu
Ma, Yuezhou
Fang, Yuchen
Zhang, Ziyi
Liu, Yong
Wang, Shiyu
Ye, Zhou
Xiang, Yang
Wang, Jianmin
Long, Mingsheng
author_facet Wang, Yuxuan
Wu, Haixu
Ma, Yuezhou
Fang, Yuchen
Zhang, Ziyi
Liu, Yong
Wang, Shiyu
Ye, Zhou
Xiang, Yang
Wang, Jianmin
Long, Mingsheng
contents Deep time series forecasting has emerged as a rapidly growing field in recent years. Despite the exponential growth of community interests, progress on standard benchmarks is often limited to marginal improvements. A common consensus of the community is that time series forecasting inherently faces a non-zero error lower bound due to its partially observable and uncertain nature. However, a fundamental question arises: how to estimate the performance upper bound of deep time series forecasters? We delve into univariate time series forecasting, a prevalent forecasting paradigm spanning traditional statistical models to advanced time series foundation models. Going beyond classical series-wise predictability metrics, we realize that the forecasting performance is highly related to window-wise properties due to the sequence-to-sequence forecasting paradigm of deep time series models and introduce a quantitative measurement of window-wise pattern complexity. Through rigorous statistical analyses over more than 4700 newly trained deep forecasting models, we discover a consistent empirical relationship between the minimum attainable forecasting error of deep models and the complexity of window-wise series patterns, which is termed the accuracy law. We further demonstrate that this empirical finding successfully guides us to identify saturated tasks from widely used benchmarks and derive an effective training strategy for time series foundation models, offering valuable insights for future research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_02729
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Exploring Accuracy Law for Deep Time Series Forecasters: An Empirical Study
Wang, Yuxuan
Wu, Haixu
Ma, Yuezhou
Fang, Yuchen
Zhang, Ziyi
Liu, Yong
Wang, Shiyu
Ye, Zhou
Xiang, Yang
Wang, Jianmin
Long, Mingsheng
Machine Learning
Deep time series forecasting has emerged as a rapidly growing field in recent years. Despite the exponential growth of community interests, progress on standard benchmarks is often limited to marginal improvements. A common consensus of the community is that time series forecasting inherently faces a non-zero error lower bound due to its partially observable and uncertain nature. However, a fundamental question arises: how to estimate the performance upper bound of deep time series forecasters? We delve into univariate time series forecasting, a prevalent forecasting paradigm spanning traditional statistical models to advanced time series foundation models. Going beyond classical series-wise predictability metrics, we realize that the forecasting performance is highly related to window-wise properties due to the sequence-to-sequence forecasting paradigm of deep time series models and introduce a quantitative measurement of window-wise pattern complexity. Through rigorous statistical analyses over more than 4700 newly trained deep forecasting models, we discover a consistent empirical relationship between the minimum attainable forecasting error of deep models and the complexity of window-wise series patterns, which is termed the accuracy law. We further demonstrate that this empirical finding successfully guides us to identify saturated tasks from widely used benchmarks and derive an effective training strategy for time series foundation models, offering valuable insights for future research.
title Exploring Accuracy Law for Deep Time Series Forecasters: An Empirical Study
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02729