Implicit Values Embedded in How Humans and LLMs Complete Subjective Everyday Tasks
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866911191149838336 |
|---|---|
| author | Arunasalam, Arjun Pickering, Madison Celik, Z. Berkay Ur, Blase |
| author_facet | Arunasalam, Arjun Pickering, Madison Celik, Z. Berkay Ur, Blase |
| contents | Large language models (LLMs) can underpin AI assistants that help users with everyday tasks, such as by making recommendations or performing basic computation. Despite AI assistants' promise, little is known about the implicit values these assistants display while completing subjective everyday tasks. Humans may consider values like environmentalism, charity, and diversity. To what extent do LLMs exhibit these values in completing everyday tasks? How do they compare with humans? We answer these questions by auditing how six popular LLMs complete 30 everyday tasks, comparing LLMs to each other and to 100 human crowdworkers from the US. We find LLMs often do not align with humans, nor with other LLMs, in the implicit values exhibited. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_03384 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Implicit Values Embedded in How Humans and LLMs Complete Subjective Everyday Tasks Arunasalam, Arjun Pickering, Madison Celik, Z. Berkay Ur, Blase Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Large language models (LLMs) can underpin AI assistants that help users with everyday tasks, such as by making recommendations or performing basic computation. Despite AI assistants' promise, little is known about the implicit values these assistants display while completing subjective everyday tasks. Humans may consider values like environmentalism, charity, and diversity. To what extent do LLMs exhibit these values in completing everyday tasks? How do they compare with humans? We answer these questions by auditing how six popular LLMs complete 30 everyday tasks, comparing LLMs to each other and to 100 human crowdworkers from the US. We find LLMs often do not align with humans, nor with other LLMs, in the implicit values exhibited. |
| title | Implicit Values Embedded in How Humans and LLMs Complete Subjective Everyday Tasks |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03384 |