Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ermilova, Alina, Kornilov, Dmitrii, Samoilova, Sofia, Laptenkova, Ekaterina, Kolesnikova, Anastasia, Podplutova, Ekaterina, Sofya, Senotrusova, Sharaev, Maksim G.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04888
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866911201028472832
author Ermilova, Alina
Kornilov, Dmitrii
Samoilova, Sofia
Laptenkova, Ekaterina
Kolesnikova, Anastasia
Podplutova, Ekaterina
Sofya, Senotrusova
Sharaev, Maksim G.
author_facet Ermilova, Alina
Kornilov, Dmitrii
Samoilova, Sofia
Laptenkova, Ekaterina
Kolesnikova, Anastasia
Podplutova, Ekaterina
Sofya, Senotrusova
Sharaev, Maksim G.
contents Identifying disease interconnections through manual analysis of large-scale clinical data is labor-intensive, subjective, and prone to expert disagreement. While machine learning (ML) shows promise, three critical challenges remain: (1) selecting optimal methods from the vast ML landscape, (2) determining whether real-world clinical data (e.g., electronic health records, EHRs) or structured disease descriptions yield more reliable insights, (3) the lack of "ground truth," as some disease interconnections remain unexplored in medicine. Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate broad utility, yet they often lack specialized medical knowledge. To address these gaps, we conduct a systematic evaluation of seven approaches for uncovering disease relationships based on two data sources: (i) sequences of ICD-10 codes from MIMIC-IV EHRs and (ii) the full set of ICD-10 codes, both with and without textual descriptions. Our framework integrates the following: (i) a statistical co-occurrence analysis and a masked language modeling (MLM) approach using real clinical data; (ii) domain-specific BERT variants (Med-BERT and BioClinicalBERT); (iii) a general-purpose BERT and document retrieval; and (iv) four LLMs (Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen, and YandexGPT). Our graph-based comparison of the obtained interconnection matrices shows that the LLM-based approach produces interconnections with the lowest diversity of ICD code connections to different diseases compared to other methods, including text-based and domain-based approaches. This suggests an important implication: LLMs have limited potential for discovering new interconnections. In the absence of ground truth databases for medical interconnections between ICD codes, our results constitute a valuable medical disease ontology that can serve as a foundational resource for future clinical research and artificial intelligence applications in healthcare.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_04888
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Revealing Interconnections between Diseases: from Statistical Methods to Large Language Models
Ermilova, Alina
Kornilov, Dmitrii
Samoilova, Sofia
Laptenkova, Ekaterina
Kolesnikova, Anastasia
Podplutova, Ekaterina
Sofya, Senotrusova
Sharaev, Maksim G.
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Identifying disease interconnections through manual analysis of large-scale clinical data is labor-intensive, subjective, and prone to expert disagreement. While machine learning (ML) shows promise, three critical challenges remain: (1) selecting optimal methods from the vast ML landscape, (2) determining whether real-world clinical data (e.g., electronic health records, EHRs) or structured disease descriptions yield more reliable insights, (3) the lack of "ground truth," as some disease interconnections remain unexplored in medicine. Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate broad utility, yet they often lack specialized medical knowledge. To address these gaps, we conduct a systematic evaluation of seven approaches for uncovering disease relationships based on two data sources: (i) sequences of ICD-10 codes from MIMIC-IV EHRs and (ii) the full set of ICD-10 codes, both with and without textual descriptions. Our framework integrates the following: (i) a statistical co-occurrence analysis and a masked language modeling (MLM) approach using real clinical data; (ii) domain-specific BERT variants (Med-BERT and BioClinicalBERT); (iii) a general-purpose BERT and document retrieval; and (iv) four LLMs (Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen, and YandexGPT). Our graph-based comparison of the obtained interconnection matrices shows that the LLM-based approach produces interconnections with the lowest diversity of ICD code connections to different diseases compared to other methods, including text-based and domain-based approaches. This suggests an important implication: LLMs have limited potential for discovering new interconnections. In the absence of ground truth databases for medical interconnections between ICD codes, our results constitute a valuable medical disease ontology that can serve as a foundational resource for future clinical research and artificial intelligence applications in healthcare.
title Revealing Interconnections between Diseases: from Statistical Methods to Large Language Models
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04888