Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Xie, Yushan, Shan, Huanyuan, Shu, Yiping, Li, Nan, Yao, Ji, Li, Ran, Cao, Xiaoyue, He, Zizhao, Li, Yin, Jullo, Eric, Kneib, Jean-Paul, Li, Guoliang
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07131
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866915596418940928
author Xie, Yushan
Shan, Huanyuan
Shu, Yiping
Li, Nan
Yao, Ji
Li, Ran
Cao, Xiaoyue
He, Zizhao
Li, Yin
Jullo, Eric
Kneib, Jean-Paul
Li, Guoliang
author_facet Xie, Yushan
Shan, Huanyuan
Shu, Yiping
Li, Nan
Yao, Ji
Li, Ran
Cao, Xiaoyue
He, Zizhao
Li, Yin
Jullo, Eric
Kneib, Jean-Paul
Li, Guoliang
contents Strongly lensed supernovae (glSNe) provide a powerful, independent method to measure the Hubble constant, $H_{0}$, through time delays between their multiple images. The accuracy of this measurement depends critically on both the precision of time delay estimation and the robustness of lens modeling. In many current cluster-scale modeling algorithms, all multiple images used for modeling are simplified as point sources to reduce computational costs. In the first paper of the CURLING program, we demonstrated that such a point-like approximation can introduce significant uncertainties and biases in both magnification reconstruction and cosmological inference. In this study, we explore how such simplifications affect $H_0$ measurements from glSNe. We simulate a lensed supernova at $z=1.95$, lensed by a galaxy cluster at $z=0.336$, assuming time delays are measured from LSST-like light curves. The lens model is constructed using JWST-like imaging data, utilizing both Lenstool and a pixelated method developed in CURLING. Under a fiducial cosmology with $H_0=70\rm \ km \ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}$, the Lenstool model yields $H_0=69.91^{+6.27}_{-5.50}\rm \ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}$, whereas the pixelated framework improves the precision by over an order of magnitude, $H_0=70.39^{+0.82}_{-0.60}\rm \ km \ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}$. Our results indicate that in the next-generation observations (e.g., JWST), uncertainties from lens modeling dominate the error budget for $H_0$ inference, emphasizing the importance of incorporating the extended surface brightness of multiple images to fully leverage the potential of glSNe for cosmology.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_07131
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle CURLING -- II. Improvement on the $H_{0}$ Inference from Pixelized Cluster Strong Lens Modeling
Xie, Yushan
Shan, Huanyuan
Shu, Yiping
Li, Nan
Yao, Ji
Li, Ran
Cao, Xiaoyue
He, Zizhao
Li, Yin
Jullo, Eric
Kneib, Jean-Paul
Li, Guoliang
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Strongly lensed supernovae (glSNe) provide a powerful, independent method to measure the Hubble constant, $H_{0}$, through time delays between their multiple images. The accuracy of this measurement depends critically on both the precision of time delay estimation and the robustness of lens modeling. In many current cluster-scale modeling algorithms, all multiple images used for modeling are simplified as point sources to reduce computational costs. In the first paper of the CURLING program, we demonstrated that such a point-like approximation can introduce significant uncertainties and biases in both magnification reconstruction and cosmological inference. In this study, we explore how such simplifications affect $H_0$ measurements from glSNe. We simulate a lensed supernova at $z=1.95$, lensed by a galaxy cluster at $z=0.336$, assuming time delays are measured from LSST-like light curves. The lens model is constructed using JWST-like imaging data, utilizing both Lenstool and a pixelated method developed in CURLING. Under a fiducial cosmology with $H_0=70\rm \ km \ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}$, the Lenstool model yields $H_0=69.91^{+6.27}_{-5.50}\rm \ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}$, whereas the pixelated framework improves the precision by over an order of magnitude, $H_0=70.39^{+0.82}_{-0.60}\rm \ km \ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}$. Our results indicate that in the next-generation observations (e.g., JWST), uncertainties from lens modeling dominate the error budget for $H_0$ inference, emphasizing the importance of incorporating the extended surface brightness of multiple images to fully leverage the potential of glSNe for cosmology.
title CURLING -- II. Improvement on the $H_{0}$ Inference from Pixelized Cluster Strong Lens Modeling
topic Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07131