Cover Image

ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Sahu, Gaurav, Larochelle, Hugo, Charlin, Laurent, Pal, Christopher
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

LitLLM: A Toolkit for Scientific Literature Review
by: Agarwal, Shubham, et al.
Published: (2024)

LitLLMs, LLMs for Literature Review: Are we there yet?
by: Agarwal, Shubham, et al.
Published: (2024)

Rethinking Literature Search Evaluation: Deep Research Helps, and Human Citation Lists Are Not a Ground Truth
by: Sahu, Gaurav, et al.
Published: (2026)

Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
by: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Learning from Committee: Reasoning Distillation from a Mixture of Teachers with Peer-Review
by: Li, Zhuochun, et al.
Published: (2024)

PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing
by: Żurawicki, Krzysztof, et al.
Published: (2026)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?
by: Church, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2024)

AInstein: Can LLMs Solve Research Problems From Parametric Memory Alone?
by: Mishra, Shambhavi, et al.
Published: (2025)

EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations
by: Zhang, Yinuo, et al.
Published: (2026)

When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews
by: Kumar, Sandeep, et al.
Published: (2026)

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review
by: Lin, Zhicheng
Published: (2025)

PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews
by: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Published: (2025)

DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
by: Weng, Yixuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Guide To Effectively Leveraging LLMs for Low-Resource Text Summarization: Data Augmentation and Semi-supervised Approaches
by: Sahu, Gaurav, et al.
Published: (2024)

Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs
by: Smit, Andries, et al.
Published: (2023)

AI Safety Should Prioritize the Future of Work
by: Hazra, Sanchaita, et al.
Published: (2025)

Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks
by: Lin, Tzu-Ling, et al.
Published: (2025)

CoCoNUTS: Concentrating on Content while Neglecting Uninformative Textual Styles for AI-Generated Peer Review Detection
by: Chen, Yihan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Detecting AI-Generated Content in Academic Peer Reviews
by: Shen, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Prompt-based Pseudo-labeling Strategy for Sample-Efficient Semi-Supervised Extractive Summarization
by: Sahu, Gaurav, et al.
Published: (2023)

LLM Review: Enhancing Creative Writing via Blind Peer Review Feedback
by: Li, Weiyue, et al.
Published: (2026)

REM-CTX: Automated Peer Review via Reinforcement Learning with Auxiliary Context
by: Taechoyotin, Pawin, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors
by: Sadallah, Abdelrahman, et al.
Published: (2025)

ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews
by: Garg, Madhav Krishan, et al.
Published: (2025)

A density estimation perspective on learning from pairwise human preferences
by: Dumoulin, Vincent, et al.
Published: (2023)

PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on the Consistency Optimization
by: Ning, Kun-Peng, et al.
Published: (2024)

BRIDGE: Predicting Human Task Completion Time From Model Performance
by: Liu, Fengyuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Exploring Prompt Engineering: A Systematic Review with SWOT Analysis
by: Singh, Aditi, et al.
Published: (2024)

CoCoReviewBench: A Completeness- and Correctness-Oriented Benchmark for AI Reviewers
by: Deng, Hexuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process
by: Chen, Zhijun, et al.
Published: (2025)

Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactions
by: Tan, Cheng, et al.
Published: (2024)

Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable
by: Saha, Rounak, et al.
Published: (2026)

Leveraging AI and NLP for Bank Marketing: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis
by: Gerling, Christopher, et al.
Published: (2024)

Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trends
by: Lan, Yunshi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Integrating Cognitive Processing Signals into Language Models: A Review of Advances, Applications and Future Directions
by: Lopez-Cardona, Angela, et al.
Published: (2025)

It is Too Many Options: Pitfalls of Multiple-Choice Questions in Generative AI and Medical Education
by: Singh, Shrutika, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems
by: Mandal, Aishik, et al.
Published: (2025)

Building Understandable Messaging for Policy and Evidence Review (BUMPER) with AI
by: Rosenfeld, Katherine A., et al.
Published: (2024)