Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noori, Mobina, Chakraborti, Mahasweta, Zhang, Amy X, Frey, Seth
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08956
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911267521822720
author Noori, Mobina
Chakraborti, Mahasweta
Zhang, Amy X
Frey, Seth
author_facet Noori, Mobina
Chakraborti, Mahasweta
Zhang, Amy X
Frey, Seth
contents We study how open source communities describe participation and control through version controlled governance documents. Using a corpus of 710 projects with paired snapshots, we parse text into actors, rules, actions, and objects, then group them and measure change with entropy for evenness, richness for diversity, and Jensen Shannon divergence for drift. Projects define more roles and more actions over time, and these are distributed more evenly, while the composition of rules remains stable. These findings indicate that governance grows by expanding and balancing categories of participation without major shifts in prescriptive force. The analysis provides a reproducible baseline for evaluating whether future AI mediated workflows concentrate or redistribute authority.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_08956
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A Human Behavioral Baseline for Collective Governance in Software Projects
Noori, Mobina
Chakraborti, Mahasweta
Zhang, Amy X
Frey, Seth
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
We study how open source communities describe participation and control through version controlled governance documents. Using a corpus of 710 projects with paired snapshots, we parse text into actors, rules, actions, and objects, then group them and measure change with entropy for evenness, richness for diversity, and Jensen Shannon divergence for drift. Projects define more roles and more actions over time, and these are distributed more evenly, while the composition of rules remains stable. These findings indicate that governance grows by expanding and balancing categories of participation without major shifts in prescriptive force. The analysis provides a reproducible baseline for evaluating whether future AI mediated workflows concentrate or redistribute authority.
title A Human Behavioral Baseline for Collective Governance in Software Projects
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08956