What Makes Looped Transformers Perform Better Than Non-Recursive Ones
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866917185468760064 |
|---|---|
| author | Gong, Zixuan Liu, Yong Teng, Jiaye |
| author_facet | Gong, Zixuan Liu, Yong Teng, Jiaye |
| contents | While looped transformers (termed as Looped-Attn) often outperform standard transformers (termed as Single-Attn) on complex reasoning tasks, the mechanism for this advantage remains underexplored. In this paper, we explain this phenomenon through the lens of loss landscape geometry, inspired by empirical observations of their distinct dynamics at both sample and Hessian levels. To formalize this, we extend the River-Valley landscape model by distinguishing between U-shaped valleys (flat) and V-shaped valleys (steep). Based on empirical observations, we conjecture that the recursive architecture of Looped-Attn induces a landscape-level inductive bias towards River-V-Valley. This inductive bias suggest a better loss convergence along the river due to valley hopping, and further encourage learning about complex patterns compared to the River-U-Valley induced by Single-Attn. Building on this insight, we propose SHIFT (Staged HIerarchical Framework for Progressive Training), a principled training strategy that accelerates the training process of Looped-Attn while achieving comparable performances. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_10089 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | What Makes Looped Transformers Perform Better Than Non-Recursive Ones Gong, Zixuan Liu, Yong Teng, Jiaye Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence While looped transformers (termed as Looped-Attn) often outperform standard transformers (termed as Single-Attn) on complex reasoning tasks, the mechanism for this advantage remains underexplored. In this paper, we explain this phenomenon through the lens of loss landscape geometry, inspired by empirical observations of their distinct dynamics at both sample and Hessian levels. To formalize this, we extend the River-Valley landscape model by distinguishing between U-shaped valleys (flat) and V-shaped valleys (steep). Based on empirical observations, we conjecture that the recursive architecture of Looped-Attn induces a landscape-level inductive bias towards River-V-Valley. This inductive bias suggest a better loss convergence along the river due to valley hopping, and further encourage learning about complex patterns compared to the River-U-Valley induced by Single-Attn. Building on this insight, we propose SHIFT (Staged HIerarchical Framework for Progressive Training), a principled training strategy that accelerates the training process of Looped-Attn while achieving comparable performances. |
| title | What Makes Looped Transformers Perform Better Than Non-Recursive Ones |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10089 |