Measuring What Matters: Connecting AI Ethics Evaluations to System Attributes, Hazards, and Harms
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909839631843328 |
|---|---|
| author | Rismani, Shalaleh Shelby, Renee Davis, Leah Rostamzadeh, Negar Moon, AJung |
| author_facet | Rismani, Shalaleh Shelby, Renee Davis, Leah Rostamzadeh, Negar Moon, AJung |
| contents | Over the past decade, an ecosystem of measures has emerged to evaluate the social and ethical implications of AI systems, largely shaped by high-level ethics principles. These measures are developed and used in fragmented ways, without adequate attention to how they are situated in AI systems. In this paper, we examine how existing measures used in the computing literature map to AI system components, attributes, hazards, and harms. Our analysis draws on a scoping review resulting in nearly 800 measures corresponding to 11 AI ethics principles. We find that most measures focus on four principles - fairness, transparency, privacy, and trust - and primarily assess model or output system components. Few measures account for interactions across system elements, and only a narrow set of hazards is typically considered for each harm type. Many measures are disconnected from where harm is experienced and lack guidance for setting meaningful thresholds. These patterns reveal how current evaluation practices remain fragmented, measuring in pieces rather than capturing how harms emerge across systems. Framing measures with respect to system attributes, hazards, and harms can strengthen regulatory oversight, support actionable practices in industry, and ground future research in systems-level understanding. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_10339 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Measuring What Matters: Connecting AI Ethics Evaluations to System Attributes, Hazards, and Harms Rismani, Shalaleh Shelby, Renee Davis, Leah Rostamzadeh, Negar Moon, AJung Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Over the past decade, an ecosystem of measures has emerged to evaluate the social and ethical implications of AI systems, largely shaped by high-level ethics principles. These measures are developed and used in fragmented ways, without adequate attention to how they are situated in AI systems. In this paper, we examine how existing measures used in the computing literature map to AI system components, attributes, hazards, and harms. Our analysis draws on a scoping review resulting in nearly 800 measures corresponding to 11 AI ethics principles. We find that most measures focus on four principles - fairness, transparency, privacy, and trust - and primarily assess model or output system components. Few measures account for interactions across system elements, and only a narrow set of hazards is typically considered for each harm type. Many measures are disconnected from where harm is experienced and lack guidance for setting meaningful thresholds. These patterns reveal how current evaluation practices remain fragmented, measuring in pieces rather than capturing how harms emerge across systems. Framing measures with respect to system attributes, hazards, and harms can strengthen regulatory oversight, support actionable practices in industry, and ground future research in systems-level understanding. |
| title | Measuring What Matters: Connecting AI Ethics Evaluations to System Attributes, Hazards, and Harms |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10339 |