Marcus Theory and The Condon Approximation Revisited II: The Horror of Triplet Energy Transfer
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866914090671144960 |
|---|---|
| author | DeRosa, Jennifer R. Qiu, Tian Cofer-Shabica, D. Vale Subotnik, Joseph E. |
| author_facet | DeRosa, Jennifer R. Qiu, Tian Cofer-Shabica, D. Vale Subotnik, Joseph E. |
| contents | We investigate the applicability of the Condon approximation (i.e. the notion that the diabatic coupling is invariant to geometry) in the context of both electron transfer (ET) and triplet energy transfer (TET) and compare the two cases. Although it is well appreciated that diabatic couplings usually arise from the interactions of electronic wavefunction tails, we show that ET tails are very different from TET tails. Using a simple model problem, our analysis explains in detail why the rates of TET decays with twice the rate of ET, while also leading to the hypothesis that the smaller diabatic couplings found for TET (versus ET) should imply more sensitivity to non-Condon fluctuations. As an example, for the classic sets of molecules investigated by Closs, we show that the Condon approximation is indeed less applicable for TET than for ET. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_11680 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Marcus Theory and The Condon Approximation Revisited II: The Horror of Triplet Energy Transfer DeRosa, Jennifer R. Qiu, Tian Cofer-Shabica, D. Vale Subotnik, Joseph E. Chemical Physics We investigate the applicability of the Condon approximation (i.e. the notion that the diabatic coupling is invariant to geometry) in the context of both electron transfer (ET) and triplet energy transfer (TET) and compare the two cases. Although it is well appreciated that diabatic couplings usually arise from the interactions of electronic wavefunction tails, we show that ET tails are very different from TET tails. Using a simple model problem, our analysis explains in detail why the rates of TET decays with twice the rate of ET, while also leading to the hypothesis that the smaller diabatic couplings found for TET (versus ET) should imply more sensitivity to non-Condon fluctuations. As an example, for the classic sets of molecules investigated by Closs, we show that the Condon approximation is indeed less applicable for TET than for ET. |
| title | Marcus Theory and The Condon Approximation Revisited II: The Horror of Triplet Energy Transfer |
| topic | Chemical Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11680 |