iCodeReviewer: Improving Secure Code Review with Mixture of Prompts
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Peng, Yun, Kim, Kisub, Meng, Linghan, Liu, Kui |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Review
by: Tang, Xunzhu, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Tang, Xunzhu, et al.
Published: (2024)
SeRe: A Security-Related Code Review Dataset Aligned with Real-World Review Activities
by: Zhao, Zixiao, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Zhao, Zixiao, et al.
Published: (2026)
Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws
by: Centellas-Claros, Leonardo, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Centellas-Claros, Leonardo, et al.
Published: (2025)
Toward Effective Secure Code Reviews: An Empirical Study of Security-Related Coding Weaknesses
by: Charoenwet, Wachiraphan, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Charoenwet, Wachiraphan, et al.
Published: (2023)
Understanding Practitioners' Expectations on Clear Code Review Comments
by: Chen, Junkai, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Chen, Junkai, et al.
Published: (2024)
A Roadmap on Modern Code Review: Challenges and Opportunities
by: Yang, Zezhou, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Yang, Zezhou, et al.
Published: (2024)
Deep Assessment of Code Review Generation Approaches: Beyond Lexical Similarity
by: Jiang, Yanjie, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Jiang, Yanjie, et al.
Published: (2025)
On the Usage of Continual Learning for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Pre-trained Language Models of Code
by: Weyssow, Martin, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Weyssow, Martin, et al.
Published: (2023)
Quo Vadis, Code Review? Exploring the Future of Code Review
by: Dorner, Michael, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Dorner, Michael, et al.
Published: (2025)
An Empirical Study of Static Analysis Tools for Secure Code Review
by: Charoenwet, Wachiraphan, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Charoenwet, Wachiraphan, et al.
Published: (2024)
Improving Automated Code Reviews: Learning from Experience
by: Lin, Hong Yi, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Lin, Hong Yi, et al.
Published: (2024)
On Unified Prompt Tuning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Chen, Xinyu, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Chen, Xinyu, et al.
Published: (2024)
Understanding Code Understandability Improvements in Code Reviews
by: Oliveira, Delano, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Oliveira, Delano, et al.
Published: (2024)
Code Review Comprehension: Reviewing Strategies Seen Through Code Comprehension Theories
by: Gonçalves, Pavlína Wurzel, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Gonçalves, Pavlína Wurzel, et al.
Published: (2025)
Improving Code Reviewer Recommendation: Accuracy, Latency, Workload, and Bystanders
by: Rigby, Peter C., et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Rigby, Peter C., et al.
Published: (2023)
Knowledge-Guided Prompt Learning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Li, Lin, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Li, Lin, et al.
Published: (2024)
An Insight into Security Code Review with LLMs: Capabilities, Obstacles, and Influential Factors
by: Yu, Jiaxin, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Yu, Jiaxin, et al.
Published: (2024)
Security of Language Models for Code: A Systematic Literature Review
by: Chen, Yuchen, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Chen, Yuchen, et al.
Published: (2024)
Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models
by: Weyssow, Martin, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Weyssow, Martin, et al.
Published: (2023)
Automated Code Review In Practice
by: Cihan, Umut, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Cihan, Umut, et al.
Published: (2024)
Fine-Tuning and Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models-based Code Review Automation
by: Pornprasit, Chanathip, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Pornprasit, Chanathip, et al.
Published: (2024)
SecureReviewer: Enhancing Large Language Models for Secure Code Review through Secure-aware Fine-tuning
by: Liu, Fang, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Liu, Fang, et al.
Published: (2025)
Automating Code Review: A Systematic Literature Review
by: Tufano, Rosalia, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Tufano, Rosalia, et al.
Published: (2025)
Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review
by: Farjana, Afia, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Farjana, Afia, et al.
Published: (2026)
CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehension Assessment for Large Language Models
by: Lin, Hong Yi, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Lin, Hong Yi, et al.
Published: (2025)
Gendered Prompting and LLM Code Review: How Gender Cues in the Prompt Shape Code Quality and Evaluation
by: Janzen, Lynn, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Janzen, Lynn, et al.
Published: (2026)
When More Retrieval Hurts: Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Generation
by: Meng, Qianru, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Meng, Qianru, et al.
Published: (2025)
COFFE: A Code Efficiency Benchmark for Code Generation
by: Peng, Yun, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Peng, Yun, et al.
Published: (2025)
Improving the Learning of Code Review Successive Tasks with Cross-Task Knowledge Distillation
by: Sghaier, Oussama Ben, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Sghaier, Oussama Ben, et al.
Published: (2024)
Demystifying Code Snippets in Code Reviews: A Study of the OpenStack and Qt Communities and A Practitioner Survey
by: Zhang, Beiqi, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Zhang, Beiqi, et al.
Published: (2023)
Code Reviewer Recommendation Based on a Hypergraph with Multiplex Relationships
by: Qiao, Yu, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Qiao, Yu, et al.
Published: (2024)
When Prompt Under-Specification Improves Code Correctness: An Exploratory Study of Prompt Wording and Structure Effects on LLM-Based Code Generation
by: AKLI, Amal, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: AKLI, Amal, et al.
Published: (2026)
ZeroCoder: Can LLMs Improve Code Generation Without Ground-Truth Supervision?
by: Fan, Lishui, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Fan, Lishui, et al.
Published: (2026)
Automated Code Review Assignments: An Alternative Perspective of Code Ownership on GitHub
by: Lulla, Jai Lal, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Lulla, Jai Lal, et al.
Published: (2025)
Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval
by: Sabir, Bushra, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Sabir, Bushra, et al.
Published: (2026)
Codexity: Secure AI-assisted Code Generation
by: Kim, Sung Yong, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Kim, Sung Yong, et al.
Published: (2024)
Clean Code In Practice: Challenges and Opportunities
by: Yan, Dapeng, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Yan, Dapeng, et al.
Published: (2025)
RepoReviewer: A Local-First Multi-Agent Architecture for Repository-Level Code Review
by: Zhang, Peng
Published: (2026)
by: Zhang, Peng
Published: (2026)
Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review
by: Kamalı, Hüseyin Özgür, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Kamalı, Hüseyin Özgür, et al.
Published: (2026)
Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Comment Generation
by: Hong, Hyunsun, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Hong, Hyunsun, et al.
Published: (2025)
Similar Items
-
CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Review
by: Tang, Xunzhu, et al.
Published: (2024) -
SeRe: A Security-Related Code Review Dataset Aligned with Real-World Review Activities
by: Zhao, Zixiao, et al.
Published: (2026) -
Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws
by: Centellas-Claros, Leonardo, et al.
Published: (2025) -
Toward Effective Secure Code Reviews: An Empirical Study of Security-Related Coding Weaknesses
by: Charoenwet, Wachiraphan, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Understanding Practitioners' Expectations on Clear Code Review Comments
by: Chen, Junkai, et al.
Published: (2024)