Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12301 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909856029474816 |
|---|---|
| author | Kronthaler, David Held, Leonhard |
| author_facet | Kronthaler, David Held, Leonhard |
| contents | Meta-analysis can be formulated as combining $p$-values across studies into a joint $p$-value function, from which point estimates and confidence intervals can be derived. We extend the meta-analytic estimation framework based on combined $p$-value functions to incorporate uncertainty in heterogeneity estimation by employing a confidence distribution approach. Specifically, the confidence distribution of Edgington's method is adjusted according to the confidence distribution of the heterogeneity parameter constructed from the generalized heterogeneity statistic. Simulation results suggest that 95% confidence intervals approach nominal coverage under most scenarios involving more than three studies and heterogeneity. Under no heterogeneity or for only three studies, the confidence interval typically overcovers, but is often narrower than the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman interval. The point estimator exhibits small bias under model misspecification and moderate to large heterogeneity. Edgington's method provides a practical alternative to classical approaches, with adjustment for heterogeneity estimation uncertainty often improving confidence interval coverage. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_12301 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Edgington's Method for Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Part I: Estimation Kronthaler, David Held, Leonhard Methodology Meta-analysis can be formulated as combining $p$-values across studies into a joint $p$-value function, from which point estimates and confidence intervals can be derived. We extend the meta-analytic estimation framework based on combined $p$-value functions to incorporate uncertainty in heterogeneity estimation by employing a confidence distribution approach. Specifically, the confidence distribution of Edgington's method is adjusted according to the confidence distribution of the heterogeneity parameter constructed from the generalized heterogeneity statistic. Simulation results suggest that 95% confidence intervals approach nominal coverage under most scenarios involving more than three studies and heterogeneity. Under no heterogeneity or for only three studies, the confidence interval typically overcovers, but is often narrower than the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman interval. The point estimator exhibits small bias under model misspecification and moderate to large heterogeneity. Edgington's method provides a practical alternative to classical approaches, with adjustment for heterogeneity estimation uncertainty often improving confidence interval coverage. |
| title | Edgington's Method for Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Part I: Estimation |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12301 |