Trading robustness: a scenario-free approach to robust Multi-Criteria Optimization for Treatment Planning
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910074587316224 |
|---|---|
| author | Cristoforetti, Remo Süss, Philipp Becher, Tobias Wahl, Niklas |
| author_facet | Cristoforetti, Remo Süss, Philipp Becher, Tobias Wahl, Niklas |
| contents | Treatment planning in radiotherapy is inherently a multi-criteria optimization (MCO) problem. Traditionally, the treatment's robustness is not formulated as a part of this decision making problem, but dealt with separately through margins or robust optimization. This work facilitates integration of robustness into multi-criteria optimization using a recently proposed efficient scenario-free (s-f) robust optimization approach: The s-f approach relies on the fast evaluation of the expected dose distribution and mean variance during optimization. This is achieved by precomputation of probabilistic quantities, which can then be used for repeated solving of subproblems in the two explored MCO approaches: Lexicographic Ordering (LO) and Pareto Front (PF) approximation. Different prioritization strategies within the LO approach are used to assess the impact of variance reduction while a 3-objective PF approximation, including a variance reduction objective, is generated to visualize and analyze trade-offs between the competing objectives. The robust optimization is performed including 100 scenarios modeling setup and range errors, as well as organ motion, on 3D- and 4DCT lung cancer patient datasets. Robustness analysis is performed to assess and explore the efficacy of all optimization strategies. The s-f approach enabled robust optimization in MCO with computational times comparable to nominal MCO. Both MCO strategies highlighted the interplay between dosimetric and variance reduction objectives. The LO approach showed how prioritization affects plan quality and robustness, while the PF analysis revealed a clear trade-off between robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. The reported analysis highlighted the conflicting trade-off nature of plan robustness and dosimetric quality, demonstrating how robust MCO supports a more informed and flexible decision-making process in treatment planning. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_12519 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Trading robustness: a scenario-free approach to robust Multi-Criteria Optimization for Treatment Planning Cristoforetti, Remo Süss, Philipp Becher, Tobias Wahl, Niklas Medical Physics Treatment planning in radiotherapy is inherently a multi-criteria optimization (MCO) problem. Traditionally, the treatment's robustness is not formulated as a part of this decision making problem, but dealt with separately through margins or robust optimization. This work facilitates integration of robustness into multi-criteria optimization using a recently proposed efficient scenario-free (s-f) robust optimization approach: The s-f approach relies on the fast evaluation of the expected dose distribution and mean variance during optimization. This is achieved by precomputation of probabilistic quantities, which can then be used for repeated solving of subproblems in the two explored MCO approaches: Lexicographic Ordering (LO) and Pareto Front (PF) approximation. Different prioritization strategies within the LO approach are used to assess the impact of variance reduction while a 3-objective PF approximation, including a variance reduction objective, is generated to visualize and analyze trade-offs between the competing objectives. The robust optimization is performed including 100 scenarios modeling setup and range errors, as well as organ motion, on 3D- and 4DCT lung cancer patient datasets. Robustness analysis is performed to assess and explore the efficacy of all optimization strategies. The s-f approach enabled robust optimization in MCO with computational times comparable to nominal MCO. Both MCO strategies highlighted the interplay between dosimetric and variance reduction objectives. The LO approach showed how prioritization affects plan quality and robustness, while the PF analysis revealed a clear trade-off between robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. The reported analysis highlighted the conflicting trade-off nature of plan robustness and dosimetric quality, demonstrating how robust MCO supports a more informed and flexible decision-making process in treatment planning. |
| title | Trading robustness: a scenario-free approach to robust Multi-Criteria Optimization for Treatment Planning |
| topic | Medical Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12519 |