Earthquake Forecasting with ETAS.inlabru
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866914096030416896 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhong, Ziwen |
| author_facet | Zhong, Ziwen |
| contents | The ETAS models are currently the most popular in the field of earthquake forecasting. The MCMC method is time-consuming and limited by parameter correlation while bringing parameter uncertainty. The INLA-based method "inlabru" solves these problems and performs better at Bayesian inference.
The report introduces the composition of the ETAS model, then provides the model's log-likelihood and approximates it using Taylor expansion and binning strategies. We also present the general procedure of Bayesian inference in inlabru.
The report follows three experiments. The first one explores the effect of fixing one parameter at its actual or wrong values on the posterior distribution of other parameters. We found that $α$ and $K$ have an apparent mutual influence relationship. At the same time, fixing $α$ or $K$ to its actual value can reduce the model fitting time by more than half.
The second experiment compares normalised inter-event-time distribution on real data and synthetic catalogues. The distributions of normalised inter-event-time of real data and synthetic catalogues are consistent. Compared with Exp(1), they have more short and long inter-event-time, indicating the existence of clustering. Change on $μ$ and $p$ will influence the inter-event-time distribution.
In the last one, we use events before the mainshock to predict events ten weeks after the mainshock. We use the number test and Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS) to measure the accuracy and precision of the predictions. We found that we need at least one mainshock and corresponding offspring to make reliable forecasting. And when we have more mainshocks in our data, our forecasting will be better. Besides, we also figure out what is needed to obtain a good posterior distribution for each parameter. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_13930 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Earthquake Forecasting with ETAS.inlabru Zhong, Ziwen Applications The ETAS models are currently the most popular in the field of earthquake forecasting. The MCMC method is time-consuming and limited by parameter correlation while bringing parameter uncertainty. The INLA-based method "inlabru" solves these problems and performs better at Bayesian inference. The report introduces the composition of the ETAS model, then provides the model's log-likelihood and approximates it using Taylor expansion and binning strategies. We also present the general procedure of Bayesian inference in inlabru. The report follows three experiments. The first one explores the effect of fixing one parameter at its actual or wrong values on the posterior distribution of other parameters. We found that $α$ and $K$ have an apparent mutual influence relationship. At the same time, fixing $α$ or $K$ to its actual value can reduce the model fitting time by more than half. The second experiment compares normalised inter-event-time distribution on real data and synthetic catalogues. The distributions of normalised inter-event-time of real data and synthetic catalogues are consistent. Compared with Exp(1), they have more short and long inter-event-time, indicating the existence of clustering. Change on $μ$ and $p$ will influence the inter-event-time distribution. In the last one, we use events before the mainshock to predict events ten weeks after the mainshock. We use the number test and Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS) to measure the accuracy and precision of the predictions. We found that we need at least one mainshock and corresponding offspring to make reliable forecasting. And when we have more mainshocks in our data, our forecasting will be better. Besides, we also figure out what is needed to obtain a good posterior distribution for each parameter. |
| title | Earthquake Forecasting with ETAS.inlabru |
| topic | Applications |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13930 |