Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16043 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908600521195520 |
|---|---|
| author | Stone, Jordan Saleh, Youssef Wright, Darryl Riedel, Jess |
| author_facet | Stone, Jordan Saleh, Youssef Wright, Darryl Riedel, Jess |
| contents | Vacuum decay posits that the universe's apparent vacuum is metastable and could transition to a lower-energy state. According to current physics models, if such a transition occurred in any location, a region of "true vacuum" would propagate outward at near light speed, destroying the accessible universe as we know it by deeply altering the effective physical laws. Understanding whether advanced technology could potentially trigger such a transition has implications for existential risk assessment and the long-term trajectory of technological civilizations. We present results from what we believe to be the first structured survey of physics experts (n = 20) regarding both the theoretical possibility of vacuum decay and its potential technological inducibility. The average responded probability that our vacuum is metastable was 45.6%, with an average estimated 18.8% probability that arbitrarily advanced technology could induce vacuum decay if our vacuum is metastable. However, the survey revealed substantial disagreement among respondents on both whether the vacuum is metastable, and, if it is, whether vacuum decay could be artificially induced with arbitrarily advanced technology. According to participants, resolving these questions primarily depends on developing theories that go beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. Among respondents who considered vacuum decay theoretically possible, it was generally expected that artificial induction would pose significant technological challenges even for a civilization with galactic resources. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_16043 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Probability of Vacuum Metastability and Artificial Vacuum Decay: Expert Survey Results Stone, Jordan Saleh, Youssef Wright, Darryl Riedel, Jess Physics and Society High Energy Physics - Theory Vacuum decay posits that the universe's apparent vacuum is metastable and could transition to a lower-energy state. According to current physics models, if such a transition occurred in any location, a region of "true vacuum" would propagate outward at near light speed, destroying the accessible universe as we know it by deeply altering the effective physical laws. Understanding whether advanced technology could potentially trigger such a transition has implications for existential risk assessment and the long-term trajectory of technological civilizations. We present results from what we believe to be the first structured survey of physics experts (n = 20) regarding both the theoretical possibility of vacuum decay and its potential technological inducibility. The average responded probability that our vacuum is metastable was 45.6%, with an average estimated 18.8% probability that arbitrarily advanced technology could induce vacuum decay if our vacuum is metastable. However, the survey revealed substantial disagreement among respondents on both whether the vacuum is metastable, and, if it is, whether vacuum decay could be artificially induced with arbitrarily advanced technology. According to participants, resolving these questions primarily depends on developing theories that go beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. Among respondents who considered vacuum decay theoretically possible, it was generally expected that artificial induction would pose significant technological challenges even for a civilization with galactic resources. |
| title | The Probability of Vacuum Metastability and Artificial Vacuum Decay: Expert Survey Results |
| topic | Physics and Society High Energy Physics - Theory |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16043 |