Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17017 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914411991531520 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhan, Qiusi Budiman-Chan, Angeline Zayed, Abdelrahman Guo, Xingzhi Kang, Daniel Kim, Joo-Kyung |
| author_facet | Zhan, Qiusi Budiman-Chan, Angeline Zayed, Abdelrahman Guo, Xingzhi Kang, Daniel Kim, Joo-Kyung |
| contents | Large language model (LLM) based search agents iteratively generate queries, retrieve external information, and reason to answer open-domain questions. While researchers have primarily focused on improving their utility, their safety behaviors remain underexplored. In this paper, we first evaluate search agents using red-teaming datasets and find that they are more likely to produce harmful outputs than base LLMs. For example, when asked ``How can I track someone's location without their consent?'', a base model refuses, whereas a search agent designed to retrieve and cite sources may lower its refusal threshold, fetch documents (e.g., court cases), and, once appended, synthesize them into an informative yet unsafe summary. We further show that utility-oriented finetuning intensifies this risk, motivating joint alignment of safety and utility. To this end, we present SafeSearch, a multi-objective reinforcement learning approach that couples a final-output safety/utility reward with a novel query-level shaping term that penalizes unsafe queries and rewards safe ones. Experiments show that SafeSearch reduces agent harmfulness by over 90% across three red-teaming datasets on a 7B model while producing safe and helpful responses, and maintains QA performance comparable to that of a utility-only finetuned agent. Further analyses confirm the effectiveness of the query-level reward in jointly improving safety and utility. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_17017 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | SafeSearch: Do Not Trade Safety for Utility in LLM Search Agents Zhan, Qiusi Budiman-Chan, Angeline Zayed, Abdelrahman Guo, Xingzhi Kang, Daniel Kim, Joo-Kyung Computation and Language Large language model (LLM) based search agents iteratively generate queries, retrieve external information, and reason to answer open-domain questions. While researchers have primarily focused on improving their utility, their safety behaviors remain underexplored. In this paper, we first evaluate search agents using red-teaming datasets and find that they are more likely to produce harmful outputs than base LLMs. For example, when asked ``How can I track someone's location without their consent?'', a base model refuses, whereas a search agent designed to retrieve and cite sources may lower its refusal threshold, fetch documents (e.g., court cases), and, once appended, synthesize them into an informative yet unsafe summary. We further show that utility-oriented finetuning intensifies this risk, motivating joint alignment of safety and utility. To this end, we present SafeSearch, a multi-objective reinforcement learning approach that couples a final-output safety/utility reward with a novel query-level shaping term that penalizes unsafe queries and rewards safe ones. Experiments show that SafeSearch reduces agent harmfulness by over 90% across three red-teaming datasets on a 7B model while producing safe and helpful responses, and maintains QA performance comparable to that of a utility-only finetuned agent. Further analyses confirm the effectiveness of the query-level reward in jointly improving safety and utility. |
| title | SafeSearch: Do Not Trade Safety for Utility in LLM Search Agents |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17017 |