Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20695 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866909865855680512 |
|---|---|
| author | Weinstein, Galina |
| author_facet | Weinstein, Galina |
| contents | This paper completes a three-part study of Einstein's 1905 special relativity by reconstructing the experimental pressures that shaped his thinking from 1895 to June 1905. Following Stachel's historiographical line, I trace Einstein's path under the cumulative weight of a series of recalcitrant experiments: stellar aberration, Arago's prism test, Fresnel's partial-drag account, Boscovich's proposal of a water-filled telescope, Fizeau's water-tube result, ether-drift null experiments, and the magnet-conductor induction asymmetry. Lorentz's electron theory attempted to domesticate these findings within a fragile ether framework, while Einstein, still loyal to Maxwell's equations, became increasingly troubled by their conflict with Galilean kinematics. The paper examines Einstein's temporary adherence to emission theory and its decisive breakdown in light of Fizeau's result. In this reconstruction, the 1905 paper does not emerge as a kinematic postulate ex nihilo, but as a principled resolution forced by an interconnected complex of experimental anomalies. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_20695 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | From Drag to Invariance: The Experimental Pressure Behind Special Relativity Weinstein, Galina History and Philosophy of Physics This paper completes a three-part study of Einstein's 1905 special relativity by reconstructing the experimental pressures that shaped his thinking from 1895 to June 1905. Following Stachel's historiographical line, I trace Einstein's path under the cumulative weight of a series of recalcitrant experiments: stellar aberration, Arago's prism test, Fresnel's partial-drag account, Boscovich's proposal of a water-filled telescope, Fizeau's water-tube result, ether-drift null experiments, and the magnet-conductor induction asymmetry. Lorentz's electron theory attempted to domesticate these findings within a fragile ether framework, while Einstein, still loyal to Maxwell's equations, became increasingly troubled by their conflict with Galilean kinematics. The paper examines Einstein's temporary adherence to emission theory and its decisive breakdown in light of Fizeau's result. In this reconstruction, the 1905 paper does not emerge as a kinematic postulate ex nihilo, but as a principled resolution forced by an interconnected complex of experimental anomalies. |
| title | From Drag to Invariance: The Experimental Pressure Behind Special Relativity |
| topic | History and Philosophy of Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20695 |