How typical is contextuality?

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rossi, Vinicius P., Zjawin, Beata, Baldijão, Roberto D., Schmid, David, Selby, John H., Sainz, Ana Belén
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866909922209300480
author Rossi, Vinicius P.
Zjawin, Beata
Baldijão, Roberto D.
Schmid, David
Selby, John H.
Sainz, Ana Belén
author_facet Rossi, Vinicius P.
Zjawin, Beata
Baldijão, Roberto D.
Schmid, David
Selby, John H.
Sainz, Ana Belén
contents Identifying when observed statistics cannot be explained by any reasonable classical model is a central problem in quantum foundations. A principled and universally applicable approach to defining and identifying nonclassicality is given by the notion of generalized noncontextuality. Here, we study the typicality of contextuality -- namely, the likelihood that randomly chosen quantum preparations and measurements produce nonclassical statistics. Using numerical linear programs to test for the existence of a generalized-noncontextual model, we find that contextuality is fairly common: even in experiments with only a modest number of random preparations and measurements, contextuality arises with probability over 99%. We also show that while typicality of contextuality decreases as the purity (sharpness) of the preparations (measurements) decreases, this dependence is not especially pronounced, so contextuality is fairly typical even in settings with realistic noise. Finally, we show that although nonzero contextuality is quite typical, quantitatively high degrees of contextuality are not as typical, and so large quantum advantages (like for parity-oblivious multiplexing, which we take as a case study) are not as typical. We provide an open-source toolbox that outputs the typicality of contextuality as a function of tunable parameters (such as lower and upper bounds on purity and other constraints on states and measurements). This toolbox can inform the design of experiments that achieve the desired typicality of contextuality for specified experimental constraints.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_20722
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle How typical is contextuality?
Rossi, Vinicius P.
Zjawin, Beata
Baldijão, Roberto D.
Schmid, David
Selby, John H.
Sainz, Ana Belén
Quantum Physics
Identifying when observed statistics cannot be explained by any reasonable classical model is a central problem in quantum foundations. A principled and universally applicable approach to defining and identifying nonclassicality is given by the notion of generalized noncontextuality. Here, we study the typicality of contextuality -- namely, the likelihood that randomly chosen quantum preparations and measurements produce nonclassical statistics. Using numerical linear programs to test for the existence of a generalized-noncontextual model, we find that contextuality is fairly common: even in experiments with only a modest number of random preparations and measurements, contextuality arises with probability over 99%. We also show that while typicality of contextuality decreases as the purity (sharpness) of the preparations (measurements) decreases, this dependence is not especially pronounced, so contextuality is fairly typical even in settings with realistic noise. Finally, we show that although nonzero contextuality is quite typical, quantitatively high degrees of contextuality are not as typical, and so large quantum advantages (like for parity-oblivious multiplexing, which we take as a case study) are not as typical. We provide an open-source toolbox that outputs the typicality of contextuality as a function of tunable parameters (such as lower and upper bounds on purity and other constraints on states and measurements). This toolbox can inform the design of experiments that achieve the desired typicality of contextuality for specified experimental constraints.
title How typical is contextuality?
topic Quantum Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20722